Freedom Of Navigation Vs Soverignty: Dampak Eskalasi Militer Di Selat Hormuz Terhadap Pasar Energi Global

Authors

  • Roberto Octavianus Cornelis Seba Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Rizki Amalia Yanuartha Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4633

Keywords:

Selat Hormuz, freedom of navigation, sovereignty, transit passage, UNCLOS 1982, keamanan energi, Indonesia

Abstract

Selat Hormuz merupakan salah satu chokepoint maritim paling strategis dalam sistem perdagangan energi dunia. Persoalan hukumnya terletak pada ketegangan antara kedaulatan negara pantai atas perairan selat dan kebebasan navigasi internasional, khususnya rezim lintas transit (transit passage) dalam United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS). Artikel ini menganalisis kedudukan hukum lintas transit di Selat Hormuz, hubungan antara sovereignty dan freedom of navigation, serta implikasi eskalasi militer terhadap pasar energi global dan ketahanan ekonomi Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan politik-ekonomi internasional. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa status sebagai perairan yang berada di bawah kedaulatan negara pantai tidak dengan sendirinya menghapus rezim khusus lintas transit. Pasal 34, 37, 38, 42, dan terutama Pasal 44 UNCLOS membentuk keseimbangan antara sovereignty negara pantai dan kepentingan navigasi internasional. Persoalan menjadi lebih kompleks karena Iran menandatangani tetapi belum meratifikasi UNCLOS, sehingga dasar keberlakuan rezim transit passage terhadap Iran perlu dianalisis juga melalui hukum kebiasaan internasional dan praktik negara. Secara ekonomi-politik, gangguan di Hormuz berpotensi memengaruhi harga minyak, LNG, biaya pelayaran, inflasi, nilai tukar, dan kebijakan fiskal negara importir. Bagi Indonesia, konsekuensi tersebut menempatkan ketahanan energi, stabilitas makroekonomi, dan diplomasi maritim sebagai satu rangkaian kebijakan yang saling terkait. Artikel ini menawarkan novelty berupa integrasi analisis hukum laut dengan pendekatan geopolitik energi dan ketahanan ekonomi Indonesia, serta menempatkan Hormuz sebagai studi mengenai batas kedaulatan dalam tata kelola chokepoint maritim global.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khabouri, K. (2026). The Legal Regime of the Strait of Hormuz‬. Journal of Palestine AhliyaUniversity for Research and Studies, 5(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59994/pau.2026.2.201

Altunöz, U., Taşdoğan, E., & Büklü, S. (2026). Energy-price shocks, exchange rates, and inflation dynamics in Asia–Pacific: evidence on state-dependent pass-through. Future Business Journal 2026 12:1, 12(1), 204-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43093-026-00907-5

An, F., Ren, S., Liu, X., & Cui, J. (2026). Energy Supply Resilience and Industrial Continuity Under a Strait of Hormuz Blockade. Energies, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112719

Asido, P. T., & Ragimun. (2026). Global Shock Transmission to the Budget Deficit: The Role of Fuel Subsidies as Fiscal Shock Absorbers. Indonesian Treasury Review, 11(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v

Bagheri, S. (2015). Iran’s attitude to security in the strait of hormuz: An international law perspective | The New Zealand Yearbook of International Law. Informit. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.829631489031290

Bai, Y. (2026). The Belligerent Strait: Transit Passage Rights and Charterparty Disputes in the 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 9(IV), 2125–2135. https://ijlmh.com/article/view/the-belligerent-strait-transit-passage-rights-and-charterparty-disputes-in-the-2026-strait-of-hormuz-crisis

Bigerna, S. (2023). Energy price shocks, exchange rates and inflation nexus. Energy Economics, 128, 107156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2023.107156

Borschberg, P. (2006). Hugo Grotius’ Theory of Trans-Oceanic Trade Regulation: Revisiting Mare Liberum (1609). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.871752

Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four as. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005

EIA. (2025a, June 16). Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint . Www.Eia.Gov. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65504

EIA. (2025b, June 24). About one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade flows through the Strait of Hormuz . Www.Eia.Gov. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65584

Eiran, E. (2026). Why do some limited regional conflicts in the maritime domain have global consequences? Evidence from two Middle Eastern wars. Frontiers in Political Science, 8, 1741706. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPOS.2026.1741706/TEXT

Gagliardone, L., & Gertler, M. (2026). Oil Prices, Monetary Policy, and Inflation Surges. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 18(4), 468–501. https://doi.org/10.1257/MAC.20240295

Guy, R. A. N. (2008, January 1). The Coastal State and Its EEZ . Www.Hydro-International.Com. https://www.hydro-international.com/article/the-coastal-state-and-its-eez

Hadid, M., Padmanabhan, R., Elomri, A., & Kerbache, L. (2026). Geopolitical disruptions in the middle east and global supply chain resilience: implications and mitigation strategies. Maritime Economics & Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-026-00366-3

Hwang, I., & Zhu, X. (2024). State-dependent oil price shocks on inflation and the efficacy of inflation targeting regime. Journal of International Money and Finance, 144, 103077. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIMONFIN.2024.103077

IMO. (2026a, March 9). IMO condemns attacks on shipping, calls for safe-passage framework in Strait of Hormuz. IMO. https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/pressbriefings/pages/imo-calls-for-safe-passage-framework-in-strait-of-hormuz.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com

IMO. (2026b, April 19). IMO condemns attacks on shipping, calls for safe-passage framework in Strait of Hormuz. Www.Imo.Org. https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/pressbriefings/pages/imo-calls-for-safe-passage-framework-in-strait-of-hormuz.aspx

IMO. (2026c, July 13). IMO Council reaffirms commitment to protecting vital shipping lanes. IMO. https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/pressbriefings/pages/imo-council-reaffirms-commitment-to-protecting-vital-shipping-lanes.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com

International Energy Agency. (2026, February). Strait of Hormuz. Untuk Supply Shock, Spare Capacity, Storage, Dan Alternative Routes. https://www.iea.org/about/oil-security-and-emergency-ission/strait-of-hormuz?

International Maritime Organization. (2026). IMO condemns attacks on shipping, calls for safe-passage framework in Strait of Hormuz. https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/pressbriefings/pages/imo-calls-for-safe-passage-framework-in-strait-of-hormuz.aspx?

Lalonde, S. (2026, February 12). 3: The enduring debate surrounding what is an ‘international strait’ in: Research Handbook on the Law of the Sea. Elgaronline. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781803925271/chapter3.xml

Lapa, K., & Xhelilaj, E. (2023). New Challenges on the Maritime Boundaries Delimitation Dispute Between Greece and Albania in the Corfu Channel. Pomorstvo, 37(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.31217/P.37.2.5

Lassoued, R. (2026a). Maritime chokepoint insecurity and systemic trade vulnerability: A transportation security assessment of the Strait of Hormuz. Journal of Transportation Security 2026 19:1, 19(1), 21-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12198-026-00345-Y

Lassoued, R. (2026b). Maritime chokepoint insecurity and systemic trade vulnerability: A transportation security assessment of the Strait of Hormuz. Journal of Transportation Security, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/S12198-026-00345-Y

Le, T. H., & Chang, Y. (2013). Oil price shocks and trade imbalances. Energy Economics, 36, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2012.12.002

Luo, J., Zhang, W., & Yang, Y. (2026). Backup supply strategies under supply disruptions and stochastic demand: a case study of crude oil procurement via the Strait of Hormuz. Frontiers in Marine Science, Volume 13-2026. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2026.1858382

Melzatia, S., Mahroji, Apollo, & Zahri, A. (2024). Geopolitical Risks and Indonesia’s Economic Resilience. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 12(4), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v12i4.1132

Meza, A., Ari, I., Al Sada, M., & Koç, M. (2026). Implications of interrupting the Hormuz Strait in the LNG trade. Journal of Transportation Security 2026 19:1, 19(1), 28-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12198-026-00350-1

Mirza, N., Naqvi, B., Rizvi, S. K. A., & Boubaker, S. (2023). Exchange rate pass-through and inflation targeting regime under energy price shocks. Energy Economics, 124, 106761. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2023.106761

Naderi, A. (2026). The price of passage: the legality of Iranian transit charges in the Strait of Hormuz under the Law of the Sea. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2026.2701606

Nasu, H. (2019). Regimes of navigation and maritime security in South East Asia. Law of the Sea in South East Asia: Environmental, Navigational and Security Challenges, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021053-11/REGIMES-NAVIGATION-MARITIME-SECURITY-SOUTH-EAST-ASIA-HITOSHI-NASU

Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 96 Tahun 2024 Tentang Cadangan Penyangga Energi, Pub. L. 96 (2024). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/297377/perpres-no-96-tahun-2024

Plant, G. (1996). The Collision Avoidance Regulations as a Regulator of International Navigation Rights: Underlying Principles and their Adequacy for the Twenty-first Century. The Journal of Navigation, 49(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300013606

Pratson, L. F. (2023). Assessing impacts to maritime shipping from marine chokepoint closures. Communications in Transportation Research, 3, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMTR.2022.100083

Prima, A., Moengin, P., Astuti, P., Sari, E., Nugrahanti, A., & Butt, O. J. (2026). Determining The Dynamics of The Petroleum Buffer Reserve of Indonesia. Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas, 49(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.v49i1.1987

Reilingh, O. G. de V. (1971). Warships in territorial waters, their right of innocent passage. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 2, 29–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0167676800004724

Rusli, H., & Bautista, L. B. (2023). Potential Implications of AUKUS and the Proposed Thai Canal on Crucial Sea Lines of Communication under the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 16(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.14330/JEAIL.2023.16.1.05

Rusli, M. H. bin M. (2012). The Application of Transit Passage Regime in Straits Used for International Navigation: A Study of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. Asian Politics and Policy, 4(4), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1943-0787.2012.01374.X;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Russ, G. R., & Zeller, D. C. (2003). From Mare Liberum to Mare Reservarum. Marine Policy, 27(1), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00054-4

Spanier, B., Shefler, O., & Rettig, E. (2021). UNCLOS and the Protection of Innocent and Transit Passage in Maritime Chokepoints. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4742492

St Fatmawati, L., Rahman, R. A., & Yusran, N. K. (2023). RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF FOREIGN SHIPS TO INDONESIAN ARCHIPELAGIC SEA LANES PASSAGE. Diponegoro Law Review, 8(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.8.1.2023.25-40

Stephens, T. (2022). Global ocean governance in the Anthropocene: From extractive imaginaries to planetary boundaries? Global Policy, 13(S3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13111;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:17585899;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Stępień, B., & Rivera León, M. A. (2025). Law Enforcement in Autonomous Shipping: Rethinking Jurisdictional Challenges under UNCLOS. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 74(S1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589325101103

Talmon, S. (2015). Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion. European Journal of International Law, 26(2), 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJIL/CHV020

Thornton, H. (2004). Hugo Grotius and the Freedom of the Seas. International Journal of Maritime History, 16(2), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/084387140401600203

UN. (1982). UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. Www.Un.Org. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part3.htm

UN. (2026). Maritime Space: Maritime Zones and Maritime Delimitation. Www.Un.Org. https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/index.htm

United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf

United Nations General Assembly. (1974). Definition of Aggression: Resolution 3314 (XXIX).

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2817. (2026). Security Council resolution 2817 (2026) On condemning attacks by the Islamic Republic of Iran against Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023, November 21). The Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most important oil transit chokepoint U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61002

U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2025a). About one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade flows through the Strait of Hormuz - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Untuk Data LNG. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65584&utm_source=chatgpt.com

U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2025b, June 16). Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65504

U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2025c, June 24). About one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade flows through the Strait of Hormuz U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65584

Yilmazkuday, H. (2024). Geopolitical risks and energy uncertainty: Implications for global and domestic energy prices. Energy Economics, 140, 107985. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2024.107985

Zabardast Alamdari, S. (2026). Energy Security at a Maritime Choke-point: The Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s Strategic Role. İmgelem, (20), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.53791/IMGELEM.1936984

Ziaee, S. Y. (2026). Iran’s New Governance on the Strait of Hormuz under International Law. Iranian Journal of International and Comparative Law, 4(1), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.22091/IJICL.2026.16060.1252

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Roberto Octavianus Cornelis Seba, & Rizki Amalia Yanuartha. (2026). Freedom Of Navigation Vs Soverignty: Dampak Eskalasi Militer Di Selat Hormuz Terhadap Pasar Energi Global. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 5(5), 4307–4321. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4633