Peralihan Kewenangan Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Menjadi Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dikaitkan dengan Keabsahan Klausula Arbitrase

Authors

  • Luqyana Shafira Alfarhani mahasiswa
  • Richard C. Adam Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4483

Keywords:

arbitration clause, ratio decidendi, annulment of arbitral award, POJK 61/POJK.07/2020, LAPS SJK

Abstract

This article examines whether an arbitration clause naming the Indonesian Capital Market Arbitration Board (BAPMI) remained enforceable after its sectoral dispute-resolution function moved to the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK). It analyses Supreme Court Decision No. 1218 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024 using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The judgment grants the appeals and restores the LAPS SJK award; its final reasoning is concise, while the published decision reproduces appellants' arguments invoking Article 47(2) of OJK Regulation No. 61/POJK.07/2020, Article 245 of Law No. 4 of 2023, and Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999. This article's contribution is a staged test of consent, transitional scope, dispute scope, and procedural safeguards. It argues that a transition rule may preserve a valid agreement only within its legal scope; it cannot create consent absent from the original contract. The date LAPS SJK received the application could not be verified from the published judgment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariprabowo, T., & Nazriyah, R. (2018). Pembatalan putusan arbitrase oleh pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1441

Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lensa penelitian hukum: Esai deskriptif tentang metodologi penelitian hukum. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2) https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280

Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law (Rev. ed.). Yale University Press.

Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) (Staatsblad 1847 No. 23).

Indonesia. (1999a). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45288/uu-no-8-tahun-1999

Indonesia. (1999b). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Download/158596/UU_1999_30.pdf

Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39188/uu-no-12-tahun-2011

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/240203/uu-no-4-tahun-2023

Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. (n.d.). Pendirian LAPS SJK. Diakses 13 Oktober 2026, dari https://www.lapssjk.id/page/tentang-kami/pendirian-laps-sjk

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2024, 28 November). Putusan Nomor 1218 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaf066d3708fea48b65c313531313136.html

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2014, 11 November). Putusan Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. https://tracking.mkri.id/index.php?id=15%2FPUU-XII%2F2014&page=web.TrackPerkara

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 61/POJK.07/2020 tentang Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/227092/peraturan-ojk-no-61pojk072020-tahun-2020

Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law (B. L. Paulson & S. L. Paulson, Trans.). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041

Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.573-586

Situmorang, M. (2021). The power of pacta sunt servanda principle in arbitration agreement. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.447-458

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2012). UNCITRAL 2012 digest of case law on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-16

How to Cite

Luqyana Shafira Alfarhani, & C. Adam, R. (2026). Peralihan Kewenangan Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Menjadi Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dikaitkan dengan Keabsahan Klausula Arbitrase. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 5(5), 3723–3734. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4483