Norma Hukum Hak Suara Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perkara Kepailitan dalam Rangka Rencana Perdamaian

Revina; Richard C. Adam

doi:10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4482

Authors

Revina mahasiswa
Richard C. Adam Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4482

Keywords:

Voting Rights, Unsecured Creditors, Bankruptcy, Composition Plan, Preventive Legal Protection

Abstract

Creditor voting in bankruptcy compositions raises proportionality concerns because claims up to IDR 10,000,000 receive one formal voting unit, while larger claims obtain additional units based on monetary increments and rounding. This article examines voting rules for unsecured creditors and proposes measures to strengthen preventive legal protection. It employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings distinguish the voting-unit formula under Article 87(3) and Government Regulation No. 10 of 2005 from the special composition threshold under Article 151. Article 151 requires both approval by more than half of eligible unsecured creditors attending the meeting and approval representing at least two-thirds of qualifying claims present. Article 152 permits a second ballot under a separate trigger, while Article 153 preserves the result against subsequent changes in creditor or claim numbers. Thus, Article 151 does not replace the creditor-count requirement with weighted voting units. The proposed improvements include standardized creditor counting, reliable claim verification, and separate reporting of creditor numbers, voting units, and claim values. The monetary threshold under Government Regulation No. 10 of 2005 should be reviewed prospectively without altering the statutory acceptance threshold.

Keywords : Voting Rights; Unsecured Creditors; Bankruptcy; Composition Plan; Preventive Legal Protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriana, Anita, dan Rai Mantili. “Implementasi Perdamaian (Accord) pada Pengadilan Niaga dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum 2, no. 2 (2017): 219–233. https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v2i2.1301.

Amerika Serikat. Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 1126(c).

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.

Cindarbumi, Berlian Pramesthi, dan Aam Suryamah. “Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Voting Online Rencana Perdamaian dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 508–522.

Disemadi, Hari Sutra, dan Danial Gomes. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 9, no. 1 (2021): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31436.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED). “Consumer Price Index: Total for Indonesia.” Seri CPALTT01IDA659N, data OECD. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01IDA659N. Diakses Oktober 2026.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Inggris. Companies Act 2006 (c. 46).

Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 1998 tentang Perhitungan Jumlah Hak Suara Kreditor. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 187.

Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 2005 tentang Penghitungan Jumlah Hak Suara Kreditor. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2005 Nomor 27, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4484.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443.

Ishak. “Perdamaian antara Debitor dan Kreditor Konkuren dalam Kepailitan.” Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2016): 137–157.

Jayadi, Hendri. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penerapan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Partij terhadap Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 3, no. 2 (2021): 279–280. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v3i2.3347.

Julyano, Mario, dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” CREPIDO 1, no. 1 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.

Leawoods, Heather. “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 2, no. 1 (2000): 489–515.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke-14. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

Patrik, Delvis, Nyulistiowati Suryanti, dan Aam Suryamah. “Kedudukan Kreditor Minoritas Dibandingkan dengan Kreditor Sekaligus Pemegang Saham dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Media Iuris 4, no. 3 (2021): 400–401. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v4i3.27478.

Ritonga, Francois Geny. “Kepastian Hukum bagi Kreditor Konkuren dalam Penyelesaian dan Pemberesan Boedel Kepailitan.” Jurnal Hukum to-ra: Hukum untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat 10, no. 3 (2024): 523–524. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v10i3.393.

Santi, Brigita Natalia Rose, dan Adi Sulistiyono. “Eksistensi Kedaulatan Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perdamaian melalui PKPU yang Berkeadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 751 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024).” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora 4, no. 3 (2025): 598–600.

Sofia, Arijna Nurin. “Kedudukan Hak Suara Kreditor Preferen dalam Persetujuan Rencana Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).” Jurist-Diction 3, no. 4 (2020): 1415–1430.