Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas Perseroan Tertutup terhadap Pengeringan Dividen oleh Pengendali Merangkap Direksi dalam Perbandingan Sistem Hukum

Authors

  • Sendi Sanjaya Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular
  • Sunarno Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4462

Keywords:

legal protection, minority shareholders, closely held company, oppression, dividend

Abstract

Minority shareholders in closely held companies face dividend deprivation because of illiquid shares and concentrated ownership and management. This normative legal study examines Indonesian protection through statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches involving the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. Legal materials were collected through document study and analysed qualitatively. Indonesian protection relies on procedural mechanisms and tort liability under Article 1365 of the Civil Code and Article 52 of the Company Law. The PT Benteng Panca Santika and PT Cakrawala Pure Bersama cases reveal remedial protection without adequate exit mechanisms. Common law provides fairness standards and share buy-out remedies. Stronger fairness standards, information rights, shareholder meeting mechanisms, and fair-value share purchases are recommended to secure effective minority protection.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Ghany, G. S., & Purwanto, A. M. D. C. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham akibat dilusi saham pada perseroan tertutup. Wajah Hukum, 8(2), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v8i2.1526

Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan.

Colombo, R. J. (2026). Shareholder derivative litigation and theories of the corporation. Drexel Law Review, 18(2), 371–454. https://drexel.edu/law/lawreview/issues/Archives/v18-2/Colombo/

Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc., 367 Mass. 578, 328 N.E.2d 505 (1975).

Ebrahimi v. Westbourne Galleries Ltd, [1973] AC 360; [1972] 2 All ER 492 (HL).

Foss v. Harbottle, 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189 (1843).

Fuady, M. (2005). Perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas. CV Utomo.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Hukum perseroan terbatas. Sinar Grafika.

Indonesia. (n.d.). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756.

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.

Khairandy, R. (2009). Perseroan terbatas: Doktrin, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan yurisprudensi. Kreasi Total Media.

Kleinberger, D. S. (2023). Fezzik, are there rocks ahead? Navigating the oppression doctrine in the age of LLCs. Florida State University Business Review, 22, 15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5122732

Kurniawan, F., Nugraha, X., Milano, A., & Soeprapto, B. O. (2026). Legal immunity and liability in emergency assistance: Rethinking the Good Samaritan Doctrine in Indonesia through comparative and international perspectives. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 17(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.26555/jhn.v17i1.30232

Licht, A. N. (2025). Good faith in corporate law: Between cognition and propriety, or whose conscience is it anyway? (European Corporate Governance Institute Law Working Paper No. 881/2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5532763

Mursidah, I. (2024). Kekuatan mengikat putusan pengadilan sebagai preseden: Antara teori dan praktik. YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v2i3.1669

Mustaqim, & Satory, A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum pemegang saham minoritas perseroan terbatas tertutup dan keadilan berdasar Pancasila. SASI, 25(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.222

Nugraha, D., Tanaya, V., Kristanto, A. K., Elisa Paka, A. P., Silalahi, J. B. I., & Silalahi, T. R. I. (2025). Perlindungan hukum pemilik saham dalam shareholders agreement perusahaan asuransi jiwa terhadap keputusan tata usaha negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(5), 3994–4009. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4792

O’Neal, F. H., & Derwin, J. (1961). Expulsion or oppression of business associates. Duke University Press.

O’Neill v. Phillips, [1999] UKHL 24, [1999] 1 WLR 1092.

Permatasari, P. (2020). Hukum perseroan terbatas dalam pasar modal. The Juris, 4(2), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v4i2.208

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3189 K/Pdt/2023 (23 November 2023).

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 969 PK/Pdt/2024 (16 Desember 2024).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Magelang Nomor 5/Pdt.G/2022/PN Mgg (9 November 2022).

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tenggarong Nomor 59/Pdt.G/2019/PN Trg (16 Januari 2020).

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Kalimantan Timur Nomor 23/PDT/2020/PT.SMR (6 April 2020).

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Setiawan, A., Martanti, Y., Sudirman, M., & Magister Kenotariatan. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham dalam menuntut dividen yang tidak dibayarkan oleh perseroan terbatas tertutup secara melawan hukum. Jurnal Prisma Hukum, 8(12), 241–247. https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jph/article/view/8158

Shobah, S. (2018). Perbedaan penerapan derivative action di Indonesia sebagai negara civil law dibandingkan dengan negara-negara penganut sistem hukum common law (Studi Putusan Perdata Nomor 02/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1273

Singapore. (2020). Companies Act 1967 (2020 Revised Edition).

Swart, W. J. C., & Lombard, M. (2025). A fair and reasonable exit from a company under section 163(2) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. De Jure Law Journal, 58(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2025/v58a4

Tang, S. S. (2020). The anatomy of Singapore’s statutory derivative action: Why do shareholders sue—or not? Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 20(2), 327–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1681049

United Kingdom. (1985). Companies Act 1985.

United Kingdom. (2006). Companies Act 2006.

Wilamarta, M. (2002). Hak pemegang saham minoritas dalam rangka good corporate governance. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc., 370 Mass. 842, 353 N.E.2d 657 (1976).

Zada, S. (2023). Redefining balance: A fresh take on unfair prejudice remedy in UK corporate law. Journal of Business, 8(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18533/2ndwmz93

Downloads

Published

2026-10-19

How to Cite

Sanjaya, S., & Sunarno. (2026). Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas Perseroan Tertutup terhadap Pengeringan Dividen oleh Pengendali Merangkap Direksi dalam Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 5(5), 3792–3808. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4462