Restorative Justice Pada Tindak Pidana Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (Pendekatan Normatif terhadap Perlindungan Pemegang Hak, Konsumen, Persaingan Usaha, dan Kepentingan Publik)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4149Keywords:
restorative justice, trademark, geographical indications, criminal law, public interestAbstract
The development of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system reflects a paradigm shift from a punitive approach to a restorative approach. However, its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes raises legal concerns because these offenses involve not only the interests of rights holders but also consumer protection, fair business competition, and broader public interests. This study examines the regulation and limitations of restorative justice in resolving trademark and geographical indication crimes within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The study employs the Theory of the Objectives of Law developed by Gustav Radbruch and John Rawls, as well as the Restorative Justice Theory proposed by Howard Zehr and Tony Marshall. This research adopts a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the regulation of restorative justice under Indonesian positive law remains general in nature and has not specifically established limitations for its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes. Unlike restorative justice in ordinary criminal offenses, which primarily focuses on restoring individual losses, its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes must also consider consumer protection, fair business competition, product reputation, and the public interest. The study concludes that restorative justice may be applied on a limited basis to certain trademark infringement cases but should be subject to stricter limitations in geographical indication cases due to their broader public interest implications. Therefore, more specific regulations are required to establish clear limitations on the application of restorative justice in trademark and geographical indication crimes in order to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal expediency.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Wahedani, A., Sugiarti, Y., & Fithry, A. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban hukum pelaku pelanggaran merek terkenal di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 20(1).
Ali, A. (2009). Menguak teori hukum (legal theory) dan teori peradilan. Kencana.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer. Kencana.
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2017). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Harahap, M. Y. (2012). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP. Sinar Grafika.
Hendrawan, I., Yanuarsyah, D., & Winanti, A. (2025). Perlindungan hukum indikasi geografis dalam perspektif hukum komparatif. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 20(1).
Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.
Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Indonesia. (2025). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Mamoribo, M. G. M. I. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terkenal berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang merek dan indikasi geografis. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 20(1).
Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Muladi. (2005). Kapita selekta sistem peradilan pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD reviews of intellectual property rights. OECD Publishing.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy (K. Wilk, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
Saidin, O. K. (2015). Aspek hukum hak kekayaan intelektual (intellectual property rights). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2006). Handbook on restorative justice programmes. United Nations.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2017). Understanding industrial property. WIPO.
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zakky Ashidqi, I Made Kantikha, Wasis Susetio, Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring, Tuti Elawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
