Kekuatan Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bima Nomor 1923/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bm

Muhammad Awaluddinul Akbar; Iksan; Zuhra

doi:10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3716

Authors

Muhammad Awaluddinul Akbar Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Iksan Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Zuhra Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3716

Keywords:

Electronic Evidence, Divorce Proceedings, Civil Evidence, Religious Court, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (EIT Law)

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has increased the use of electronic evidence in divorce proceedings within the Indonesian Religious Courts. Although Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, as most recently amended by Law Number 1 of 2024, recognizes electronic information and electronic documents as legally valid evidence, their application and evidentiary value in judicial practice remain subject to legal debate. This study aims to analyze the legal status of electronic evidence and examine the judges’ legal reasoning in assessing its admissibility and evidentiary strength in Decision of the Bima Religious Court Number 1923/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bm. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through library research and document analysis and examined qualitatively using normative legal analysis. The findings indicate that electronic evidence constitutes legally recognized evidence and represents an extension of the civil evidentiary system. In the case examined, the panel of judges accepted digital communications as corroborative evidence and assessed them alongside witness testimony and other documentary evidence. However, the judgment did not comprehensively address the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of the electronic evidence. Therefore, more comprehensive judicial guidelines are required to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal utility in evaluating electronic evidence in divorce proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpansa, R., Yuliarsyah, A., Hukum, F. I., & Pamulang, U. (2026). Legalitas Bukti Digital dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata di Era Siber. Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(1), 389–399.

Arifatunnisa, S., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Kedudukan Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Pasca Penerapan Peradilan Digital. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 4(1), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17865598

ArikhaAlfiana, D. (2024). Kajian Yuridis Dispensasi Perkawinan Terhadap Tingkat Perceraian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Agama Jepara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik (JIHHP), 4(6).

Arofah, L. (2021). Menakar Kekuatan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/menakar-kekuatan-alat-bukti-elektronik-dalam-perkara-perceraian-oleh-dr-hj-lailatul-arofah-m-h-22-11

Bachsin, A., Ekoputro, H. F. H., Arya, H. I., Ranggana, Oktorifa, J. N., Ramadhan, Fadhillah, M. S., & Siswajanthy, F. (2025). Kedudukan dan Penilaian Hakim terhadap Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Al-Zayn-Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum, 3(3), 2364–2370. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1601

Bhuiyan, M. R. I. (2024). Examining the digital transformation and digital entrepreneurship: A Prisma based systematic review. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.0077

Bukido, R., Azzochrah, N. A., Zakariah, A. A., & Paikah, N. (2025). Divorce Among Female Muslim Civil Servants: Legal Perspectives in Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 25(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i1.85-116

Defriza, R., Nisa, A. K., Islam, A., & Mandailing, N. (2022). Perkembangan penggunaan alat bukti pada perkara perdata dimasa pandemi Covid-19 di Pengadilan Agama Panyabungan. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 3(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.56874/el-ahli.v3i1.746

Ekoyusmario, M., Humaerah, & Agis, A. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Menyembunyikan Tersangka Pelaku Kejahatan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 1(4), 489–501.

Firmansyah, A. W., Alauddin, R., & Malik, F. (2022). Perkembangan Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata. Amanna Gappa, 60–74. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/agjl/article/view/22163

Gea, A. Y. (2024). Development of Criminal Evidence Law in Indonesia. Legal Brief, 13(3), 768–779.

Gunawan, E., & Hakim, B. R. (2018). Pelaksanaan Itsbat Nikah Pasca Berlakunya Uu No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Di Pengadilan Agama. Syariah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 18(2), 258. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i2.2319

Haikal, M. S., & Amarini, I. (2025). Independensi Peradilan : Studi Kritis Terhadap Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Yang Memberikan Putusan Dalam Kasus Ronald Tannur. Jurnal Serambi Hukum, 18(2), 206–214.

Handoyo, D. A. P., Shelomita, M., Syavitrie, A. A., & Handayani, S. (2026). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Surat Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembuktian. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 4396–4410. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4903

Harefa, S. (2026). The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Relation to the Right to Privacy in Cases of SExual Content Dissemination. Domus Legalos Cogitatio Law Journal, 3(1), 1–20.

Heradhyaksa, B., & Jamal, J. (2019). The Opportunities of the Application of Islamic Criminal Law According to Indonesian Constitution. Journal of Islamic Law Studies (JILS), 2(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jils/vol2/iss2/1

Hermawan, A. F., Siradj, M., & Khamida, N. (2023). Pembuktian Elektronik pada Perkara Perceraian. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Administrasi Keperdataan Islam, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jhk-aki.v1i1.31179

Iswanto, B. T., & Sulistyaningsih, P. (2018). Kajian Yuridis Pembuktian dengan Informasi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Varia Justicia, 14(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v14i1.2047

Khoirul Abror. (2017). Hukum Perkawinan Dan Perceraian. Ladang Kata.

Lestari, E. F., Rahmayanti, R., & Aruan, D. C. (2026). Problematika Pembuktian Digital dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber di Indonesia. Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 5(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.6623

Liang, N., Grayson, S. J., Kussman, M. A., Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2024). In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455

Marshall, P. (2011). What you say on Facebook may be used against you in a court of family law: Analysis of this new form of electronic evidence and why it should be on every matrimonial attorney’s radar. Ala. L. Rev., 63, 1115. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A15%3A12552767/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Acrawler&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A83005706&jrnl=00024279&crl=f&link_origin=www.google.com

Maryam, F., Wulandari, F., Wulandari, R., & Handayani, S. (2026). Inkonsistensi Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Perdata. Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 3(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i1.2901

Moechtar, O., Valentino, B., & Wahono, D. C. (2020). Kajian komparatif lembaga penolakan waris dalam perspektif hukum waris adat dan Islam. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(3), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4225

Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019

Murti, T. W., & Kholiq, A. (2025). Reformulation of Electronic Evidence in Forex Trading Manipulation Crimes. Justisi, 11(2), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4264

Nashir, F., & Mustafida, L. (2021). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Putusan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta. Fortiori Law Journal, 1(02), 23–56. https://jurnal.ucy.ac.id/index.php/flj/article/view/924

Pradipa, A., & Ganesha, U. P. (2025). Analisis terhadap Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Pasca UU ITE dan Perkembangan E-Court. Konsensu: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i3.989

Rahmadani, G., & Irham, M. I. (2024). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik: Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Medan. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 23(2), 144–153.

Ripels, C. A., Herliani, D. A., & Simarmata, A. S. H. (2026). Kedudukan Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461

Roslaili. (2025). Legal Analysis Of The Validity Of Electronic Documents And Signatures As Evidence In Legal Proceedings In Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Global Development, 1(2), 78–90.

Sukmasari, A., Frederik, W., Kalalo, M. E., & Soepeno, M. H. (2024). Application Of Electronic Evidence as Extension of Legal Civil Evidence Divorce Cases in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.95

Surahman, Abdurrahim, Anandy, W., Hamdani, F., & Nnawulezi, U. (2025). Administrative Justice in the Perspective of Islamic Legal Philosophy : A Comparative Study of Ethical Legitimacy and Bureaucratic Rationality. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 12(2), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8991

Taufiqurahman, F., Bakhtiar, H. S., Hukum, I., Pembangunan, U., Veteran, N., Elektronik, A. B., Digital, F., Acara, H., Agama, P., Evidence, E., Forensics, D., & Procedure, R. C. (2025). Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 192/PDT.G/2020/PA.BITG). Global Research and Innovation Journal (GREAT), 1(3), 2800–2808.

Teguh, P. P. (2026). Reconstructing the Role of Judges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law : Between the Principle of Judicial Passivity and Procedural Justice. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v10i1.13393

Teresa, & Kurniawan, C. S. (2023). Syibhul Iddah as a Form of Justice for Women Mubadalah Perspective. El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law Vol., 4(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24042/el-izdiwaj.v4i2.19427

Wibisono, Y. (2022). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Mabsut: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 16(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v16i2.687

Zil’Iffah, A. L. (2022). Pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim tipikor dalam memutus perkara korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 56/Pid.Sus/TPK/2016/PN.Bgl dan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 55/Pid.Sus/TPK/2019/PN.Smg). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/62126