Civil-Military Relations Dynamics in Indonesia: An Analysis of Integration Strategy and Accountability in Defense Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3491Keywords:
Strategic Leadership, Defense Governance, Civil-Military Relations, Accountability, Security Sector ReformAbstract
Twenty-first century security threats are increasingly hybrid and multidimensional, demanding defense governance that no longer rests solely on modernization of weapon systems, but on synergy between strategic leadership and accountable civil-military relations. Following the 1998 Reformasi, Indonesia laid the normative foundation for objective civilian control through Law No. 3/2002 and Law No. 34/2004; nevertheless, consolidation remains overshadowed by structural rigidities and sociocultural residues from the New Order. This article analyzes the urgency of synergy between strategic leadership and defense governance in constructing an ideal civil-military relations model in Indonesia, employing a narrative literature review that thematically curates and synthesizes literature by interrelated sub-topics. Findings indicate that defense governance effectiveness remains constrained by bureaucratic fragmentation, inter-service sectoral ego, and residual militaristic autonomy that impede substantive civilian control, even where the regulatory framework is adequate. As a resolution, the article recommends transitioning from coercive control toward collaborative security governance, with integration of joint civil-military leadership education at institutions such as Lemhannas and the Indonesian Defense University as a strategic instrument to build shared strategic language and cross-sectoral trust. The findings affirm that accountable civilian supremacy and military professionalism are absolute prerequisites for Indonesia's national defense resilience.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (1992). Regional Military-Security Cooperation in the Third World: A Conceptual Analysis of the Relevance and Limitations of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). Journal of Peace Research, 29(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343392029001002
Arif, M., Afriansyah, A., Chairil, T., & Lestari, G. A. (2024). Grey zone conflict in the south china sea: The challenges for indonesian maritime security governance. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 46(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs46-3c
Brooks, R. (2020). Paradoxes of Professionalism: Rethinking Civil-Military Relations in the United States. International Security, 44(4), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00374
Brooks, R. (2025). Understanding Current Threats to Democracy: The Limits of the Civil-Military Relations Paradigm. Daedalus, 154(4), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED.a.959
Buzan, B. (2003). Security architecture in Asia: The interplay of regional and global levels. The Pacific Review, 16(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000069660
Carter, S. M., & Greer, C. R. (2013). Strategic Leadership: Values, Styles, and Organizational Performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812471724
Chandra, S., & Kammen, D. (2002). Generating Reforms and Reforming Generations: Military Politics in Indonesia's Democratic Transition and Consolidation. World Politics, 55(1), 96–136.
Crane, T. A. (2014). The Long Game: A Strategic Analysis of Military Drawdowns.
Croissant, A., & Kuehn, D. (2024). Autocratization and the military. In The Routledge Handbook of Autocratization. Routledge.
Croissant, A., Kuehn, D., Chambers, P. W., & Wolf, S. O. (2011). Conceptualising Civil-Military Relations in Emerging Democracies. European Political Science, 10(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.2
Croissant, A., Kuehn, D., Chambers, P., & Wolf, S. O. (2010). Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: Conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies. Democratization, 17(5), 950–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2010.501180
Cunha, B. Q., Lopez, F. G., & Coban, M. K. (2026). The Unexpected Actor? Civil-Military Relations and Regulatory Agency Control in Brazil. Governance, 39(1), e70106. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70106
Demir, F. (2005). Militarization of the Market and Rent-Seeking Coalitions in Turkey. Development and Change, 36(4), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00429.x
Dzhyhora, O., Kuchmenko, V., Salamakha, I., Serohina, N., & Savitskyi, V. (2024). The role of defense forces in ensuring national military potential: A comparative analysis of countries. Economic Affairs, 69(1), 725–734.
Farrell, T. (2005). World Culture and Military Power. Security Studies, 14(3), 448–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410500323187
Feaver, P. D. (1996). The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control. Armed Forces & Society, 23(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X9602300203
Feaver, P., & Desch, M. (2000). Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. The American Political Science Review, 94, 506. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586089
Ferede, W. L., Endawoke, Y., & Tessema, G. (2024). Effects of strategic leadership on change management: Examining the mediating roles of accountability, knowledge management, and organizational culture in public organizations: a study in Central Gondar, Ethiopia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2416613. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2416613
Garcia, D. (2014). Not yet a democracy: Establishing civilian authority over the security sector in Brazil – lessons for other countries in transition. Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893489
Graham, S. (2012). When Life Itself is War: On the Urbanization of Military and Security Doctrine. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01026.x
Grier, R. A. (2012). Military Cognitive Readiness at the Operational and Strategic Levels: A Theoretical Model for Measurement Development. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(4), 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343412444606
Griffin, S. (2017). Military Innovation Studies: Multidisciplinary or Lacking Discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 196–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358
Heiduk, F. (2011). From guardians to democrats? Attempts to explain change and continuity in the civil–military relations of post-authoritarian Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560959
Hoffman, F. (2025). The Next National Defense Strategy: Mission-Based Force Planning. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 55. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3342
Holen, S. V. (2026). Protecting Populations: Military Officers Navigating Boundaries Between Soldiering and Policing. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.464
Honna, J. (2013). Security Challenges and Military Reform in Post-authoritarian Indonesia: The Impact of Separatism, Terrorism, and Communal Violence (pp. 185–199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29624-6_9
Janowitz, M. (1964). The Military in the Political Development of New Nations. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 20(8), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1964.11454697
Kuehn, D., & Lorenz, P. (2011). Explaining Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Structure, Agency and Theory Development. Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2011.628145
Kurniawan, J. N., Yudha. (2022). The Parliament and Cooperative Oversight of the Indonesian Armed Forces: Why Civil–Military Relations in Indonesia is Stable but Still in Transition. Armed Forces & Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0095327X221137281
Laksmana, E. A. (2011). Defence Diplomacy in Southeast Asia: Trends, Prospects and Challenges (From 'Boots' to 'Brogues,' pp. 71–89). S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05908.10
Laksmana, E. A. (2017). Threats and civil–military relations: Explaining Singapore's "trickle down" military innovation. Defense & Security Analysis, 33(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1377369
Laksmana, E. A. (2019). Civil-Military Relations under Jokowi: Between Military Corporate Interests and Presidential Handholding. Asia Policy, 14(4), 63–71.
Laksmana, E. A. (2021). A Fragile Fulcrum: Indonesia-U.S. Military Relations in the Age of Great-Power Competition. Asia Policy, 16(4), 106–114.
Lewińska, M. (2016). The Role of Communication in Military Leadership. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 2, 37. https://doi.org/10.12775/JCRL.2015.003
Liu, H. (1998). Old Linkages, New Networks: The Globalization of Overseas Chinese Voluntary Associations and its Implications. The China Quarterly, 155, 588–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000050001
Liu, J. (2025). Designing duality: From procedural policy instrument to the statecraft of hybrid sovereignty. Policy Sciences, 58(4), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09590-9
Mamshae, A. (2025). Between Merit and Patronage: Hybrid Appointments of Top Civil Service. Governance, 38(2), e12914. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12914
Mietzner, M. (2011). Overcoming Path Dependence: The Quality of Civilian Control of the Military in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2011.628148
Motseki, M. M., Maluleke, W., & Dlamini, S. (2020). Military role in democratic transition and succession: Lessons from the Kingdom of Lesothos. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1847845. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1847845
Mowery, D. C. (2012). Defense-related R&D as a model for "Grand Challenges" technology policies. Research Policy, 41(10), 1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.027
Mukherjee, A., & Pion-Berlin, D. (2022). The fulcrum of democratic civilian control: Re-imagining the role of defence ministries. Journal of Strategic Studies, 45(6–7), 783–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2127094
Nalle, V. I. W. (2026). Legislating civil–military relations in post-Reformasi Indonesia. Global Change, Peace & Security, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2025.2611247
Peets, I. (2024). The hidden cost of excess capabilities: A threat to future military readiness. Defense & Security Analysis, 40(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2024.2325220
Posen, B. R. (2016). Foreword: Military doctrine and the management of uncertainty. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2015.1115042
Raska, M., & Bitzinger, R. A. (2023). Introduction: The AI Wave in Defence Innovation. In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation. Routledge.
Rendon, J. M., & Rendon, R. G. (2016). Procurement fraud in the US Department of Defense: Implications for contracting processes and internal controls. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6–7), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2015-1267
Sebastian, L. C., & Gindarsah, I. (2013). Assessing military reform in Indonesia. Defense & Security Analysis, 29(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2013.842709
Selivanovskikh, L., Giardino, P. L., Cristofaro, M., Bao, Y., Yuan, W., & Wang, L. (2025). Strategic ambiguity: A systematic review, a typology and a dynamic capability view. Management Decision, 63(13), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2024-1021
Snyder, J. (1984). Civil-Military Relations and the Cult of the Offensive, 1914 and 1984. International Security, 9(1), 108–146.
Suchman, L. (2023). Imaginaries of omniscience: Automating intelligence in the US Department of Defense. Social Studies of Science, 53(5), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221104938
Taş, H. (2024). Populism and civil–military relations. Democratization, 31(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2255976
Terriff, T. (2006). Warriors and Innovators: Military Change and Organizational Culture in the US Marine Corps. Defence Studies, 6(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702430601056139
Travis, D. S. (2019). Pursuing Civilian Control Over the Military. Armed Forces & Society, 45(3), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X18781539
Wangge, H. Y. R. (2017). Civil–Military Relations during Transition and Post-Democratisation Periods: A View from Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600205
Wlnslow, D. (1998). Misplaced Loyalties: The Role of Military Culture in the Breakdown of Discipline in Peace Operations. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 35(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1998.tb00727.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jay Aryaputra, Asep Adang Supriyadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








