Money Politics and Its Complexity: Evidence form Four Regencies in Indonesia

Evidence form Four Regencies in Indonesia

Authors

  • Faris Widiyatmoko Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Reja Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Afgan Fadilla Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Hasyim Nawawi Agustianto Researcher at Politika Research and Consulting (PRC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2613

Keywords:

pembelian suara, ambivalensi moral, identifikasi partai, pemilihan lokal, politik uang

Abstract

Praktik jual beli suara di Indonesia menunjukkan paradoks yang terus-menerus antara penolakan moral dan keterlibatan pragmatis, yang mencerminkan interaksi yang sangat kompleks antara cita-cita demokrasi dan realitas patronase. Studi ini meneliti pengaruh identifikasi partai, pendidikan, pendapatan, dan kelompok usia terhadap sikap dan pengalaman pemilih terhadap praktik jual beli suara di empat kabupaten, yakni Banjar, Humbang Hasundutan, Kolaka, dan Lamongan. Dengan menggunakan desain penjelasan kuantitatif dan regresi logistik berdasarkan data survei pasca-pemilu 2024, studi ini menganalisis bagaimana faktor-faktor ini membentuk persepsi moral dan partisipasi perilaku dalam transaksi pemilu. Temuan menunjukkan pola ambivalensi moral-praktis yang konsisten: meskipun sebagian besar responden menolak praktik jual beli suara sebagai tindakan yang tidak pantas, tapi masih banyak yang berpartisipasi di dalamnya. Identifikasi partai melemahkan resistensi moral dan memperkuat jaringan transaksional, sedangkan pendidikan dan kelompok generasi memperkuat kesadaran etis, meskipun tidak merata di berbagai wilayah. Pendapatan tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan, menunjukkan bahwa praktik ini melintasi batas kelas. Secara keseluruhan, praktik pembelian suara di Indonesia beroperasi sebagai mekanisme adaptif dan tertanam secara sosial dalam demokrasi patronase, di mana nilai-nilai, kebutuhan, dan loyalitas terus dinegosiasikan dalam arena pemilihan. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi kompleksitas multidimensional dari pertukaran politik, mengungkapkan bahwa partisipasi demokratis Indonesia dipertahankan melalui keseimbangan yang rumit antara moralitas, pragmatisme, dan timbal balik sosial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Reja, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Hasyim Nawawi Agustianto, Researcher at Politika Research and Consulting (PRC)

Researcher at Politika Research & Consulting (PRC) 

References

Agerberg, M. (2019). The Curse of Knowledge? Education, Corruption, and Politics. Political Behavior, 41(2), 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9455-7

Amick, J. (2018). Missing the poorest in rural areas? Targeting low income voters in mayoral elections. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2018.7

Apriani, K. D., & Irhamna. (2020). Party-Id dan Tendensi Politik Uang di Provinsi Bali: Studi Kasus Pilkada Bali Tahun 2018. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 3(1), 1–15.

Aspinall, E. (2015). Money politics: Patronage and clientelism in Southeast Asia. In Routledge handbook of southeast Asian democratization (pp. 299–313). Routledge.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and The State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Aspinall, E., Rohman, N., Hamdi, A. Z., Rubaidi, & Triantini, Z. E. (2017). Vote buying in Indonesia: Candidate strategies, market logic and effectiveness. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.31

Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage Au.

Baniya, J., Meserve, S. A., Pemstein, D., & Seim, B. (2024). Understanding vote buying in Nepali elections. Electoral Studies, 88, 102766.

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The America Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Canare, T. A., Mendoza, R. U., & Lopez, M. A. (2018). An empirical analysis of vote buying among the poor: Evidence from elections in the Philippines. South East Asia Research, 26(1), 58–84.

Çarkoğlu, A., & Aytaç, S. E. (2015). Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000320

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Cruz, C. (2019). Social Networks and the Targeting of Vote Buying. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 382–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784062

Fossati, D. (2020). Electoral reform and partisan dealignment in Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 41(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119826389

Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J., & Nickerson, D. W. (2012). Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00540.x

Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C. K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2014). The conditionality of vote-buying norms: Experimental evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12047

Hadiz, V. R. (2012). Democracy and money politics: The case of Indonesia. In Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian politics (pp. 71–82). Routledge.

Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., & Muhtadi, B. (2022). Buying Brokers Electoral Handouts beyond Clientelism in a Weak-Party State. In World Politics (Vol. 74, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000216

Jensen, P. S., & Justesen, M. K. (2014). Poverty and vote buying: Survey-based evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies, 33(March 2014), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.020

Justesen, M. K., & Manzetti, L. (2023). Poverty, Partisanship, and Vote Buying in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 48(13). https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2022.66

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage publications.

Mares, I., & Young, L. (2016). Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060514-120923

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang Dan Dinamika Elektoral Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal Interaksi Antara “ Party-Id” Dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), 41–58. www.annualreviews.org.

Muhtadi, B. (2019a). Politik Uang dan New Normal dalam Pemilu Paska-Orde Baru. Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, 5(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.413

Muhtadi, B. (2019b). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. Springer Nature.

Muhtadi, B., Warburton, E. A., & Gammon, L. (2025). Complacent Democrats: The Political Preferences of Gen Z Indonesians. Journal of East Asian Studies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2025.10011

Mujani, S., Liddle, R. W., & Ambardi, K. (2019). Kaum Demokrat Kritis: Analisis Perilaku Pemilih Indonesia sejak Demokratisasi. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Mulyaningsih, H., & Hertanto. (2025). Knowledge and Attitudes of the Younger Generation towards Money Politics in the 2024 General Election. POLITIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.16.1.2025.1-14

Nichter, S. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080106

Regif, S. Y., & Pribadi, M. A. (2024). Destruction Democracy Through Determinants of Vote Buying in General Elections in Indonesia. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 4(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.4.1.15-30

Sari, M. M. K., Huda, M., & Warsono, W. (2023). University student voters’ resistance to money politics. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v9i1.988

Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/9781107660397%0A?C

Tawakkal, G. T. I. (2025). Party ID and election design: political parties in informal practices in Indonesian elections. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2504126

Tawakkal, G. T. I., Suhardono, W., Garner, A. D., & Seitz, T. (2017). Consistency and vote buying: Income, education, and attitudes about vote buying in Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.15

Ugur-Cinar, M., Cinar, K., & Kose, T. (2020). How Does Education Affect Political Trust?: An Analysis of Moderating Factors. Social Indicators Research, 152(2), 779–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02463-z

Vicente, P. C., & Wantchekon, L. (2009). Clientelism and vote buying: Lessons from field experiments in African elections. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp018

Wagner, M. L. (2019). The Dynamics of Vote Buying in Developing Democracies: Party Attachment and Party Competition in Southeast Asia. In Dissertation in Political Science College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Widiyatmoko, F., Reja, Fadilla, A., & Nawawi Agustianto, H. (2026). Money Politics and Its Complexity: Evidence form Four Regencies in Indonesia: Evidence form Four Regencies in Indonesia. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 5(3), 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2613