Consent-Based Approach Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Kajian Komparatif Dan Prospek Adopsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2554Keywords:
consent-based approach, sexual violence law, evidentiary model, comparative lawAbstract
: Pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) merupakan tonggak legislatif penting dalam upaya perlindungan korban di Indonesia. Namun demikian, terdapat kesenjangan mendasar yang belum terjawab: undang-undang ini mempertahankan pendekatan pembuktian berbasis paksaan, bukan mengadopsi consent-based approach yang telah menjadi standar normatif global. Artikel ini mengkaji mengapa Indonesia belum mengadopsi consent-based approach dan apa implikasi yuridis serta sosiokultural dari pilihan tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif-perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi model persetujuan di Swedia, Inggris, Kanada, Jepang, dan Belanda, serta mengevaluasi kompatibilitasnya dengan tradisi civil law dan konteks sosiokultural Indonesia. Penelitian menemukan bahwa adopsi penuh model affirmative consent atau communicative consent berisiko menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidaksesuaian struktural. Sebagai novelty, artikel ini mengusulkan model hibrida Contextual Consent with Structural Presumption yang mempertahankan kerangka dasar UU TPKS namun menambahkan rebuttable presumption of non-consent pada relasi kuasa asimetris sebagaimana diatur Pasal 6 dan Pasal 12. Model ini, didukung panduan yudisial dan reformasi prosedural berbasis trauma, menawarkan jalur adopsi bertahap yang kompatibel dengan sistem hukum Indonesia sekaligus memperkuat perlindungan korban secara efektif.
Downloads
References
Angelita, Akbar, H., & Purnomo, E. A. (2025). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana dalam Kasus Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia dengan Hukum Pidana Belanda. Https://Glonus.Org/Index.Php/Konstitusi/Article/View/298.
Bergman, S., & Thunberg, S. (2025). Rethinking Rape Laws Emphasizes the Central Role of Consent in Shaping Both Legal Frameworks and Public Understanding. International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP), 7, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0702.822
Bettinson, V. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Non-Fatal Strangulation Offences: Will the Proposed s. 75A Serious Crime Act 2015 Work for Victims of Domestic Violence and Abuse? Journal of Criminal Law, 86(2), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183221086426
Bettinson, V., & Wake, N. (2024). A New Self-Defence Framework for Domestic Abuse Survivors Who Use Violent Resistance in Response. Modern Law Review, 87(1), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12837
CPS data summary Quarter 2 2022-2023. (2024). Https://Www.Cps.Gov.Uk/Publication/Cps-Data-Summary-Quarter-2-2022-2023.
Criminal Code R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, Pub. L. C–46, e Minister of Justice at the following address: (2026).
Dempsey, M. M. (2022). Sexual Violence and the Affirmative Consent Standard: A Philosophical Assessment. Legal Theory, 28(1), 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325222000039
Fileborn, B., & Loney-Howes, R. (2019). Metoo and the politics of social change. In MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0
Fransiska, A., & Sergio, D. (2024). Pelanggaran conditional consent dalam hubungan seksual: analisis terhadap undang-undang TPPKS. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.29210/020244658
Gregory, J., & Less, S. U. E. (1996). Attrition in Rape and Sexual Assault Cases. The British Journal of Criminology, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014060
Gruber, A. (2022). Affirmative Consent. In Consent and Sexual Offenses (pp. 57–82). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748930242-57
Harris, J. (n.d.). A Study of Attrition in Rape Cases [University of Surrey]. Retrieved https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/doctoral/A-Study-of-Attrition-in-Rape/99511632502346/filesAndLinks?index=0
Herring, J. (2023). Rethinking sexual crimes: from women’s consent to men’s responsibility. Https://Ora.Ox.Ac.Uk/Objects/Uuid:E9712f51-413b-463d-A32f-A708db6e433e.
Hörnle, T. (2022). Rape Law Reform in Germany: Consent, Coercion, and Criminal Liability. German Law Journal, 23(5), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.52
Keiler, J. (2023). From coercion to consent: Dutch rape law reform and the complexities of consent. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(6), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241232627
Kholik, M. A., & Zulfaidah, R. (2026). Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah sebagai Prinsip Konstitusional dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence,Economic and Legal Theory, 4. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v12i2.2739
Lentjes, N. (Noud). (2024). Een verkenning van het bestanddeel ‘de wil ontbreekt’ uit de Wet seksuele misdrijven. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Strafrecht, 4(4), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.5553/nts/266665532023004004005
Marsh, L., & Dein, J. (2021). Serious sex offences in England and Wales: Defending the indefensible. In Sexual Violence on Trial: Local and Comparative Perspectives. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356087-7
Matthews, I. ;, Stobbs, N. ;, & Matthews, I. (2025). Affirmative Consent and Patriarchal Paradigms of Power in the Criminal Law. UNSW Law Journal, 48(2). http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/105695
Mattson, R. E., Parker, M. M., McKinnon, A. M., Massey, S. G., Merriwether, A. M., Hardesty, M., & Young, S. R. (2022). Just Say Yes? A Cluster Analytic Approach to Evaluating College Students’ Understandings of Affirmative Consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(6), 3197–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02217-z
McDonald, E. (2009). Temkin & Krahe, Sexual Assault and the Justice Gap: A Question of Attitude. Pace Law Review, 29(2), 349. https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.1076
McGlynn, C., & Munro, V. (2010). Rethinking rape law: International and comparative perspectives.
McGlynn, C., & Rackley, E. (2021). Criminalising Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Affirmative Consent and the Challenge of Digital Evidence. Journal of Criminal Law, 85(3), 188–207.
Munro, V. E. (2017). Shifting Sands? Consent, Context and Vulnerability in Contemporary Sexual Offences Policy in England and Wales. Social and Legal Studies, 26, 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916682584
Munro, V. E., & Kelly, L. (2022). A Vicious Cycle: Attrition and Conviction in Rape Cases under a Consent-Based Framework. British Journal of Criminology, 62(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab054
Nanda Dwi Rizkia, & Hardi Fardiansyah. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris) (Elan Jaelani, Ed.). Widina Media Utama.
Nova, E. (2025). Implikasi Yuridis Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Bagi Pembenuhan Keadilan Korban. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.31933/vfqn8k12
Nova, E., & Elda, E. (2022). Implikasi Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Korban dalam Sistim Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Implikasi yang Berkeadilan Gender. UNES Law Review, 5, 564–579. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i2.361
Pineau, L. (1989a). Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis. In Source: Law and Philosophy (Vol. 8, Number 2). http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/3504696
Pineau, L. (1989b). Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis. In Source: Law and Philosophy (Vol. 8, Number 2). http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/3504696
Reid, P. M. (2022). A Human Rights-Based Approach to the Prosecution of Sexual Crime: Victims and Prosecutorial Decision-Making. University of Glasgow.
Savitri, N. (2020). Pembuktian dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak (Kajian Putusan Nomor 159/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Kpg.). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4i2.323
Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2017). Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 102–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.02.003
Supreme Court Judgments Case Number 26493, 265 Supreme Court Judgments 26493 (1998).
Tadros, V. (2021). Consent to sex in an unjust world. Ethics, 131, 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/711210
Timmers, R. W. (2025). Eén jaar strafbaarstelling van seksuele intimidatie in de openbare ruimte in de praktijk: Een indringende benadering? In: PROCES: Tijdschrift Voor Strafrechtspleging, 104(4), 189–194.
Trauma-informed Responses to Sexual Assault. (n.d.).
Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2018). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728561
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irpan Suriadiata, Suci Ramadhani Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








