Pengembangan Prototipe KIDGROW sebagai Sistem Analitik Pembelajaran Longitudinal untuk Pemantauan Perkembangan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i10.4089Keywords:
ADDIE, Asesmen Formatif, Dashboard Analitik, Learning Analytics, Sekolah DasarAbstract
KIDGROW dikembangkan untuk mengatasi pencatatan asesmen yang terfragmentasi sehingga perkembangan belajar siswa sekolah dasar sulit dipantau secara longitudinal. Dengan ADDIE, sistem mengintegrasikan asesmen diagnostik dan formatif, analitik pertumbuhan, dasbor guru dan kepala sekolah, serta rekomendasi berbasis aturan. Analisis kebutuhan melibatkan 18 guru, enam kepala sekolah, dan 18 sekolah dasar di Jawa Timur. Desain menghasilkan arsitektur web-cloud tiga lapis, basis data longitudinal relasional, dan mesin rekomendasi transparan. Setelah tiga siklus pengembangan, dilakukan 42 skenario black-box serta validasi ahli, pengujian kinerja, dan kompatibilitas. Guru memprioritaskan dasbor longitudinal (94,4%), laporan otomatis (88,9%), dan rekomendasi pembelajaran (83,3%). Keberhasilan black-box meningkat dari 90,5% menjadi 100%; validasi ahli mencapai 87,5%, dengan waktu respons 1,3–5,4 detik. KIDGROW layak untuk implementasi longitudinal lebih lanjut.
Downloads
References
Aguilera, C. A., Castro, A., Scheihing, E., & Medina Paredes, J. (2026). Offline technology for rural AI literacy: Steps towards a holistic educational solution. Sustainability, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105105
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
Betebenner, D. (2009). Norm- and criterion-referenced student growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00161.x
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
Day, E., Pothong, K., Atabey, A., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Who controls children’s education data? A socio-legal analysis of the UK governance regimes for schools and EdTech. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2152838
Divanji, R. A., Bindman, S., Tung, A., Chen, K., Castaneda, L., & Scanlon, M. (2023). A one stop shop? Perspectives on the value of adaptive learning technologies in K-12 education. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100157
Dülger, M., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2025). Designing a classroom-level teacher dashboard to foster primary school teachers’ direct instruction of self-regulated learning strategies. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 14785–14819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13389-9
Gašević, D., Greiff, S., & Shaffer, D. W. (2022). Towards strengthening links between learning analytics and assessment: Challenges and potentials of a promising new bond. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107304
Kaliisa, R., Jivet, I., & Prinsloo, P. (2023). A checklist to guide the planning, designing, implementation, and evaluation of learning analytics dashboards. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00394-6
Karademir, O., Borgards, L., Di Mitri, D., Strauß, S., Kubsch, M., Brobeil, M., Grimm, A., Gombert, S., Rummel, N., Neumann, K., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Following the impact chain of the LA Cockpit: An intervention study investigating a teacher dashboard’s effect on student learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8399
Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., & Molenaar, I. (2020). How teachers integrate dashboards into their feedback practices. Frontline Learning Research, 8(4), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i4.641
Kruachottikul, P., Dumrongvute, P., Tea-makorn, P., Kittikowit, S., & Amrapala, A. (2023). New product development process and case studies for deep-tech academic research to commercialization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00311-1
Li, J., Xue, E., & Guo, S. (2025). The effects of PISA on global basic education reform: a systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04403-z
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Paavilainen, T., López-Pernas, S., Väisänen, S., Kontkanen, S., & Hirsto, L. (2025). Using learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in primary education: A learning design perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1299–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09808-4
Possaghi, I., Vesin, B., Zhang, F., Sharma, K., Knudsen, C., Bjørkum, H., & Papavlasopoulou, S. (2025). Integrating multi-modal learning analytics dashboard in K-12 education: Insights for enhancing orchestration and teacher decision-making. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00410-4
Themeli, A., Kotsifakos, D., & Psaromiligkos, Y. (2026). Vygotsky’s Systemic Perspectives on Managing the Risk of Student Failure in Technology-Enhanced Learning Design. In Applied Sciences (Vol. 16, Issue 7, p. 3398). https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073398
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
van Kessel, M., Molenaar, I., Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., de Jonge, M., & Saab, N. (2025). Primary school teacher perspectives on effective dashboard use in the classroom: Skills, knowledge, and contextual conditions. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8493
van Leeuwen, A., Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., Molenaar, I., & Rummel, N. (2021). How teacher characteristics relate to how teachers use dashboards: Results from two case studies in K-12. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7325
van Leeuwen, A., Strauß, S., & Rummel, N. (2023). Participatory design of teacher dashboards: Navigating the tension between teacher input and theories on teacher professional vision. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1039739. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1039739
Wang, X. S., Perry, L. B., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: a systematic review. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
