Development of Integrated Interactive E-Modules for Problem Based Learning in Mathematics Learning for Grade XI Phase F of Senior High School

Yudiana Yudiana; Zelhendri Zen; Abna Hidayati; Mutiara Felicita  Amsal; Rayendra

doi:10.55681/armada.v4i7.3157

Authors

Yudiana Yudiana Department of Educational Technology, Graduate School, Padang State University, Indonesia
Zelhendri Zen Department of Educational Technology, Graduate School, Padang State University, Indonesia
Abna Hidayati Department of Educational Technology, Graduate School, Padang State University, Indonesia
Mutiara Felicita Amsal Department of Educational Technology, Graduate School, Padang State University, Indonesia
Rayendra Department of Educational Technology, Graduate School, Padang State University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i7.3157

Keywords:

Interactive e-module, Mathematical problem solving skills, Matrix, Problem-Based Learning, Secondary mathematics education

Abstract

The transformation of learning under the Independent Curriculum requires digital teaching materials that support active learning and strengthen mathematical problem-solving skills. However, matrix instruction remains dominated by conventional materials, making abstract concepts difficult for students to understand. This study aims to develop a valid, practical, and effective interactive e-module integrated with Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for Grade XI Phase F students. The study employed a Research and Development approach using the 4-D model, comprising define, design, develop, and disseminate stages. Data were collected through validation sheets, practicality questionnaires, and learning outcome tests. The results showed that the e-module achieved 92.68% validity, categorised as very valid, and 98.75% practicality, categorised as very practical. Its effectiveness was demonstrated by an increase in the average score from 31.67 to 92.92, with an N-Gain value of 0.90 in the high category. These findings indicate that the PBL-integrated e-module effectively improves students’ understanding of matrix concepts and mathematical problem-solving skills while supporting the Independent Curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abuhassna, H., & Alnawajha, S. (2023). Instructional Design Made Easy! Instructional Design Models, Categories, Frameworks, Educational Context, and Recommendations for Future Work. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education , 13 (4), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13040054

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach . Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Furqanisah, F., & Arifin, Z. (2024). Evaluation of the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum at SMAN 14 Bandung. Curriculum Innovation , 21 (4), 2061–2074. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i4.74814

Harianto, NA & I Gde Wawan Sudatha. (2024). Interactive Multimedia with Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology , 7 (4), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i4.64656

Hasan, A. (2024). Problem-Based Math Learning Strategies To Improve Students' Problem-Solving Skills. The Journal of Academic Science , 1 (1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.59613/rm65x686

Hase, A., & Kuhl, P. (2024). Teachers' use of data from digital learning platforms for instructional design: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development , 72 (4), 1925–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10356-y

Hendriko, N., Syafriandi, S., Armiati, A., & Jamaan, EZ (2024). Practicality Of Problem-Based Learning-Based E-Module To Improve Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program , 13 (3), 870–884. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i3.8921

Khairul Anshari, Fitri Farida, & Febrelly Sabatini. (2024). E-Module Development Using Kvisoft Flipbook for the Basics of Vocational Electronics Engineering Subject at SMK Taruna Pekanbaru. EduTeach : Journal of Education and Learning Technology , 5 (1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.37859/eduteach.v5i1.6822

Liu, B., Salvendry, G., & Kuczek, T. (1999). The Role of Visualization in Understanding Abstract Concepts. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics , 3 (4), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327566ijce0304_2

Lu, D., & Xie, Y.-N. (2024). The application of educational technology to develop problem-solving skills: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity , 51 , 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101454

Maghfiroh, K., Dwijanto, D., & Cahyono, AN (2024). Development of Mathematics E-Module to Improve Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Skills in Problem Based Learning Models. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education , 13 (3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v13i3.2112

N. Christi, S.R., & Rajiman, W. (2023). The Importance of Computational Thinking in Mathematics Learning. Journal on Education , 5 (4), 12590–12598. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2246

Narh-Kert, M., Ampadu, E., & Yeboah, R. (2025). Pupils' problem-solving perceptions and competencies in mathematics. SN Social Sciences , 5 (11), 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01205-7

Nguyen, T.-T., Nguyen, N.D., Trinh, TPT, Tong, D.H., Uyen, B.P., & Han, N.N. (2024). Vietnamese sixth graders' mathematical communication competency developed by fraction teaching topics using the 5E model. Heliyon , 10 (20), e39440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39440

Nurrijal, Punaji Setyosari, Dedi Kuswandi, & Saida Ulfa. (2023). Creative Problem Solving Process Instructional Design in the Context of Blended Learning in Higher Education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning , 21 (2), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.2.2653

Putra, JA, Enjang Ali Nurdin, Nusuki Syariati Fathimah, & Wahyudin. (2024). Design and Development of Interactive Multimedia Applying Problem-Based Learning to Enhance Problem-Solving Skills. Bit-Tech , 6 (3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v6i3.1207

Santosa, MH, Surya Putra, IBYB, & Pratiwi, NPA (2024). EFL Students' Online Learning Readiness: Performing Out the Basic Functions of Technology. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching , 12 (1), 59. https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v12i1.3590

Sari, NW, Huda, N., & Kumalasari, A. (2025). The Effect of Implementing CTL and PBL Models on Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability . 7 (1).

Schoenherr, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Characterizing external visualization in mathematics education research: A scoping review. ZDM – Mathematics Education , 56 (1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01494-3

Senadheera, VV, Ediriweera, D.S., & Rupasinghe, T.P. (2024). Instructional Design Models for Digital Learning in Higher Education—A Scoping Review. Journal of Learning for Development , 11 (1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.973

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook . Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CaxOAQAAMAAJ

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Acevedo-Borrega, J., & Cerezo-Pizarro, M. (2022). Educational Technology and Student Performance: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education , Volume 7-2022 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916502

Van Der Meij, J., Van Amelsvoort, M., & Anjewierden, A. (2017). How design guides learning from matrix diagrams. Instructional Science , 45 (6), 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9425-1

Vermeulen, E. J., & Volman, M. L. L. (2024). Promoting Student Engagement in Online Education: Online Learning Experiences of Dutch University Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning , 29 (2), 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3

Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. The Australian Educational Researcher , 51 (5), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1

Wasi'ah, N., & Cahyono, AN (2025). Interactive Multimedia as a Catalyst for Improving Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. Pedagogia: Scientific Journal of Education , 17 (2), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagogia.v17i2.64

Wei, H., Bos, R., & Drijvers, P. (2024). Developing Functional Thinking: From Concrete to Abstract Through an Embodied Design. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education , 10 (3), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00142-z

Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education , 163 , 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097

Yumiati, Haji, S., & Ramadhani, M. (2025). Effectiveness of understanding by design-based e-modules in higher education mathematics: A systematic literature network analysis. Algebra : Journal of Mathematics Education , 16 (2), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i2.28872

Zhang, L., Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2024). Enhancing mathematical problem posing competence: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. International Journal of STEM Education , 11 (1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00507-1