Rekonstruksi Peran Komite Sekolah dalam Mendukung Pertumbuhan Petani Milenial : Studi Kasus di SMK-PP Negeri Kupang

Mariyanti Nenohai; Hotmaulina Sihotang; Lisa G. Kailola

doi:10.55681/armada.v4i7.2884

Authors

Mariyanti Nenohai Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Hotmaulina Sihotang Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Lisa G. Kailola Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i7.2884

Keywords:

School Committee, Millennial Farmers, Social Engineering, Parent Partnership, SMK PP Negeri Kupang, Epstein Model

Abstract

Krisis regenerasi petani di Indonesia merupakan tantangan struktural yang mengancam keberlanjutan pangan. Sensus Pertanian 2023 menunjukkan dominasi petani berusia lanjut, sementara keterlibatan generasi muda rendah. SMK PP Negeri Kupang telah mengintegrasikan kurikulum pertanian dan Program Penumbuhan Wirausahawan Muda Pertanian (PWMP) untuk mendorong lahirnya petani milenial. Namun, pelaksanaannya menghadapi hambatan sosiokultural, terutama stigma negatif terhadap profesi petani dan terbatasnya akses siswa terhadap lahan keluarga. Penelitian ini menganalisis peran Komite Sekolah dan merumuskan rekonstruksinya sebagai agen rekayasa sosial yang menjembatani sekolah, keluarga, dan masyarakat. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus di SMK PP Negeri Kupang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran Komite Sekolah masih terbatas pada komunikasi, penyelesaian masalah, dan dukungan pendanaan. Berdasarkan model kemitraan Joyce Epstein, Komite Sekolah direposisi sebagai agen pengasuhan yang menyosialisasikan prospek pertanian dan memfasilitasi pemanfaatan lahan keluarga sebagai media praktik siswa. Rekonstruksi ini dapat memperkuat efektivitas PWMP dan mempercepat regenerasi petani milenial di Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addi, A., & Raccah, A. (2024). The role of digital capital in parental engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 16901–16928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12455-y

Ani, S. W., Darwanto, D. H., Waluyati, L. R., & Masyhuri. (2024). Regeneration of rural rice farmers in Central Java Province. Environmental Challenges, 16, Article 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100971

Antony-Newman, M. (2024). Teachers and school leaders’ readiness for parental engagement: Critical policy analysis of Canadian standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231199365

Ardyanti, R. K., Purnomo, M., & Kustanti, A. (2024). Driving factors of the rapid development of millennial farmers in Malang Raya. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2024.120115

Ayyıldız, B., Erdal, G., Çiçek, A., & Ayyıldız, M. (2025). Factors influencing rural youth’s tendency to stay in agriculture in Türkiye. Sustainability, 17(8), Article 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083313

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. (2023). Hasil pencacahan lengkap Sensus Pertanian 2023 Tahap I Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Hasil pencacahan lengkap Sensus Pertanian 2023—Tahap I.

Bahaw, P., Baboolal, A., Mack, A. J., & Carter-Rogers, K. (2024). Exposure to entrepreneurship education interventions reveal improvements to vocational entrepreneurial intent: A two-wave longitudinal study. Discover Education, 3, Article 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00241-4

Belando-Montoro, M. R., Fernández-Salinero, C., Virgós-Sánchez, M., & Naranjo-Crespo, M. (2025). The decision-making of students in post-compulsory education: Influence of personal, academic, family, and socioeconomic dimensions on the choice of vocational education and training. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1739–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02026-1

Carbone, A., Carillo, F., Ciaian, P., Sardone, R., Antonioli, F., & Tur Cardona, J. (2024). Does the European Union start-up aid help young farmers to innovate and to join networks? Agriculture, 14(10), Article 1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101772

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Chatzichristos, G., & Hennebry, B. (2023). Social innovation in rural governance: A comparative case study across the marginalised rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deže, J., Sudarić, T., & Tolić, S. (2023). Social innovations for the achievement of competitive agriculture and the sustainable development of peripheral rural areas. Economies, 11(8), Article 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11080209

Effendy, L., Widyaastuti, N., & Lastri, H. (2022). The millennial farmers’ interest in succeeding the family agriculture for hydroponic application in Garut District, West Java, Indonesia. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2022.100308

Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., Van Voorhis, F. L., Martin, C. S., Thomas, B. G., Greenfeld, M. D., Hutchins, D. J., & Williams, K. J. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (4th ed.). Corwin.

Espinoza, M., Rivarola, R., Fort, R., & Fisher, J. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of social innovation programming at advancing rural development in the context of exogenous shocks. Sustainability, 16(13), Article 5664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135664

Figurek, A., Morphi, K., & Thrassou, A. (2024). A sustainable risk management model and instruments for young farmers in EU agriculture. Sustainability, 16(1), Article 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010283

Girard, P. (2023). From family to markets: How institutional determinants of rural youth transitions have changed in Senegal and Zambia over time. Journal of Rural Studies, 101, Article 103040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103040

Griffin, C., Sirimorok, N., Dressler, W. H., Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Faturachmat, F., Muin, A. V. F., Andary, P. M., Batiran, K. B., Rahmat, Rizaldi, M., Toumbourou, T., Suwarso, R., Salim, W., Utomo, A., Akhmad, F., & Clendenning, J. (2024). The persistence of precarity: Youth livelihood struggles and aspirations in the context of truncated agrarian change, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 41(1), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10489-5

Haryati, N., Lasitya, D. S., Nurirrozak, M. Z., Herdianti, D. F., Fibrianingtyas, A., & Hidayat, A. R. T. (2024). Demographics and course choices: Impact on youth farming intention in Indonesia. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), Article 2358088. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2358088

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Irawan, N. C., Irham, Mulyo, J. H., & Suryantini, A. (2023). Unleashing the power of digital farming: Local young farmers’ perspectives on sustainable value creation. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 9(2), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.18196/agraris.v9i2.239

Jeanneaux, P., Wendling, E., Desjeux, Y., Enjolras, G., & Latruffe, L. (2025). Structure and determinants of the cost of setting up a farm: The case of young farmers in Central France. Journal of Rural Studies, 114, Article 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103583

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2016 tentang Komite Sekolah.

Kusnandar, K., Apriliyani, E. K., Wicaksono, A., & Saville, R. (2024). Local supply chain actor roles in farmer organisation information networks: Empirical findings from two Indonesian farmer organisations. World Development Perspectives, 35, Article 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100619

Lediana, E., Perdana, T., Deliana, Y., & Sendjaja, T. P. (2023). Sustainable entrepreneurial intention of youth for agriculture start-up: An integrated model. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032326

Licciardo, F., Henke, R., Piras, F., & Zanetti, B. (2024). The setting-up measure to support generational renewal in agriculture: The Italian experience. World, 5(4), 1130–1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/world5040057

Lone, A. H., & Baba, I. R. (2024). Entrepreneurial intentions of progressive farmers: The influence of innovativeness, risk-taking and proactiveness. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 14(4), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-08-2022-0185

Martinez-Yarza, N., Solabarrieta-Eizaguirre, J., & Santibáñez-Gruber, R. (2024). The impact of family involvement on students’ social-emotional development: The mediational role of school engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(4), 4297–4327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00862-1

Mattas, K., Staboulis, C., Tsakiridou, E., Natos, D., Polymeros, A., Baranowski, P., Bojar, W., Parra Rivero, O., Ojeda Roldán, Á., Baldi, L., & Arfini, F. (2024). Facilitating generational renewal in rural areas by responding to young farmers’ voices: Echoes from the Greek territory. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, Article 103480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103480

McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12973

Mdoda, L., Loki, O., Zantsi, Y., Mvelase, L., Nontu, Y., & Madende, P. (2026). Youth aspirations and entrepreneurial motivation in agriculture: Insights from smallholder farmers in OR Tambo District, Eastern Cape. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, Article 1727042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1727042

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mulibana, L., & Tshikovhi, N. (2024). Rural entrepreneurship and innovation in BRICS economies: Secondary evidence from rural areas in South Africa. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062408

Nandi, R., Pratheepa, C. M., Nedumaran, S., Rao, N., & Rengalakshmi, R. (2022). Farm parent and youth aspirations on the generational succession of farming: Evidence from South India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, Article 804581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.804581

Ngadi, Zaelany, A. A., Latifa, A., Harfina, D., Asiati, D., Setiawan, B., Ibnu, F., Triyono, & Rajagukguk, Z. (2023). Challenge of agriculture development in Indonesia: Rural youth mobility and aging workers in agriculture sector. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020922

Nguyen, G. N., & Nguyen, T. K. (2024). Entrepreneurial passion of business and technical students: The roles of subjective norms, entrepreneurial education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and risk propensity. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 101012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101012

Okello, D., Mshenga, P., Saidi, M., Juma, F., Maria, S., Egeru, A., & Gogo, E. (2024). Entrepreneurship education in East, West and North Africa higher education institutions: Mapping agripreneurship curriculum and lecturers’ competencies. Discover Education, 3, Article 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00204-9

Parry, K., Cooper, B., Bjornlund, H., Crase, L., Moyo, M., & Dube, T. (2025). Institutions influencing plot access and intergenerational land transfer: Policy insights from a smallholder irrigation scheme in Zimbabwe. Journal of Rural Studies, 114, Article 103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103576

Prasetyaningrum, D. I., Ruminar, H., & Irwandi, P. (2022). The perception and interest of career choices in agriculture: Case of agroecotechnology and agribusiness students. Habitat, 33(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.2.19

Putranto, F. G. F., Natalia, C., & Pitriyani, N. K. D. (2024). Closing the gap between education and labor market requirement: Do vocational education matter? The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 5(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v5i3.614

Qonita, R. R. A., Masyhuri, Jamhari, & Perwitasari, H. (2025). Social environmental support in encouraging entrepreneurial behavior of millennial farmers in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia: An effort to realize sustainable agriculture. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 40(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v40i1.92724

Rahaman, W. A., Mohammed, I., Turkson, F. E., & Baffour, P. T. (2023). Influences of parental occupation on children’s occupational choices. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(12), 1735–1755. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2022-0705

SMK-PP Negeri Kupang. (2020). Rencana strategis SMK-PP Negeri Kupang 2020–2024.

Steiner, A., Calò, F., & Shucksmith, M. (2023). Rurality and social innovation processes and outcomes: A realist evaluation of rural social enterprise activities. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.006

Tikum, K., & Ahmad, M. M. (2024). Challenges of making a new farmer: A case study of Thailand’s Young Smart Farmer program. Development Studies Research, 11(1), Article 2414014. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2024.2414014

Touch, V., Tan, D. K. Y., Cook, B. R., Liu, D. L., Cross, R., Tran, T. A., Utomo, A., Yous, S., Grunbuhel, C., & Cowie, A. (2024). Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: Implications for agricultural production, environment and food security. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, Article 122536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122536

Wang, E., Li, S., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Longitudinal effect of career-related parental support on vocational college students’ proactive career behavior: A moderated mediation model. Current Psychology, 43(13), 11422–11434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05268-8

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.