Pengembangan Kompetensi Komunikasi Host Live TikTok dalam Perspektif Computer-Mediated Communication: Studi pada PT HiGOOD Live
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i4.1943Keywords:
Kompetensi Komunikasi, Host Live TikTok, Computer-Mediated CommunicationAbstract
Host live tidak hanya berperan sebagai penyampai informasi produk, tetapi juga sebagai komunikator digital yang harus mampu membangun interaksi, menjaga kepercayaan audiens, dan menyesuaikan komunikasi dengan karakter platform TikTok Live. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam semi-terstruktur dengan host live TikTok dan pihak manajemen, observasi non-partisipatif terhadap aktivitas live streaming, serta dokumentasi berupa rekaman siaran. Informan dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling berdasarkan keterlibatan mereka dalam aktivitas live dan proses pembinaan host. Analisis data dilakukan melalui reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, dengan keabsahan data diperkuat melalui triangulasi sumber. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT HiGOOD Live mengembangkan kompetensi host melalui pelatihan berbasis praktik, penguatan kemampuan berbicara, pengelolaan audiens, strategi engagement, evaluasi berbasis data, serta pembinaan etika komunikasi digital. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pengembangan host live TikTok perlu dilakukan secara terstruktur agar host mampu menjadi komunikator digital yang efektif dalam lingkungan CMC.
Downloads
References
Abadi, R., & Ivoniasari, D. (2024). Live streaming commerce dan perilaku konsumen digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Digital, 6(2), 115–130.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Polity Press.
Chandra, C. K. (2024). How warmth, competence, and trust shape consumer purchase intention in live-stream e-commerce on TikTok. Journal of Digital Business, 5(1), 33–48.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th, Ed.). Sage.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1998). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd, Ed.). Pearson Education.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3, Ed.). Sage.
Mubarok, M. H., Madonna, M., & Reza, F. (2024). Host communication styles and language variations in context of TikTok live-streaming commerce. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 11(3), 78–94.
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 114.
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4, Ed.). Sage.
Social, W. A., & Meltwater. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia.
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Wang, H. (2024). Exploring brand attachment dynamics in live streaming platforms. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(2), 55–72.
Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032
Zhang, M., Qin, F., Wang, G. A., & Luo, C. (2020). Live streaming commerce and consumer trust. Electronic Commerce Research, 20, 1–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





