Dualisme Hukum dan Fenomena Underreporting : Studi Sosio-Hukum pada Masyarakat Adat Dayak Benuaq

Authors

  • Alifiana Arif Rahmah Aulia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
  • Aryo Subroto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
  • Setiyo Utomo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3293

Keywords:

Customary Law, Underreporting, Dayak Benuaq, Socio-Legal Analysis, Legal Culture, Trust in Law Enforcement

Abstract

Report legal violations to state authorities, using a conceptual socio-legal approach supported by qualitative references and empirical documentation of customary dispute-resolution practices. Findings indicate that strong cultural reliance on customary institutions, limited trust in state law enforcement, historical experiences of unequal treatment, and the perceived effectiveness of adat mechanisms collectively shape underreporting behavior. Although Indonesian legal regulations emphasize equal access to justice and encourage public participation in formal reporting processes, evidence from various studies shows a persistent gap between legal norms and community practices. A documented conflict-resolution case in a Benuaq village demonstrates how customary deliberation was chosen over police reporting due to expectations of restorative outcomes and fear of escalating the dispute. Structural issues, such as geographical distance from police posts, limited responsiveness of authorities, and socio-economic vulnerabilities further reinforce the community's preference for adat forums. This study concludes that underreporting among the Dayak Benuaq reflects broader socio-legal dynamics where formal institutions fail to gain full legitimacy, allowing customary systems to remain the dominant avenue for addressing disputes. Strengthening trust, improving state, community relations, and recognizing the complementary role of adat are essential for ensuring equitable access to justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anyon, F. J., & Bahari, Y. (2021). Interaksi sosial aparat pemerintah dan masyarakat adat dalam penyelesaian sengketa. Jurnal Borneo: Ilmu Sosial Humaniora, 15(2), 112–115.

Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.

Gounaris, S. P., & Venetis, K. (2002). Trust in industrial service relationships: Behavioral consequences. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(6), 421–436.

Heidoh. (2025, November 19). Amnesty urges revocation of Indonesia’s newly passed KUHAP revision amid human rights concerns. https://heidoh.com/indonesia/amnesty-urges-revocation-of-indonesia-s-newly-passed-kuhap-revision-amid-human-rights-concerns

Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2022). Survei kepercayaan publik terhadap penegak hukum. Jakarta: Indikator.

Larashati, P., & Imanullah, M. N. (2023). Kajian sosiologi hukum tentang tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap aparat penegak hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 11(1).

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0c36/9b5042157e1d8f16aff003d0ea5c4d1af867.pdf

Lembaga Survei Indonesia. (2022). Survei kepercayaan publik terhadap penegak hukum. Jakarta: LSI.

Maryanto, W. (2010). Hukum adat Suku Dayak Benuaq di Kabupaten Kutai Barat Kalimantan Timur: Tata cara adat dalam penyelesaian perkara. Pontianak: BPS-NT.

Rizaty, M. A. (2022, October 21). Survei LSI: Kepercayaan publik kepada Polri anjlok menjadi 53%. DataIndonesia. https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/survei-lsi-kepercayaan-publik-kepada-polri-anjlok-menjadi-53

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

Syahrum, M. (2023). Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum: Kajian penelitian normatif-empiris. Jakarta: CV DOTPLUS Publisher. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=hNFiEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1

Tempo.co. (2025). Pasal-pasal kontroversial dalam RUU KUHAP yang segera disahkan DPR.

https://www.tempo.co/hukum/pasal-pasal-kontroversial-dalam-ruu-kuhap-yang-segera-disahkan-dpr-2090495

Tsing, A. L. (1998). In the realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in an out-of-the-way place. Princeton University Press. (Jika dipakai dalam teks; opsional)

Utama, A. S. (2019). Kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(3).

https://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org/ojs-2.4.8-3/

Warassih, E. (2011). Pranata hukum: Sebuah telaah sosiologis. Semarang: Suryandaru Utama.

Wekke, I. S. (2019). Community policing dalam masyarakat multikultural di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(2), 87–95.

Zakiyyah, Q. (2023). Hukum adat masyarakat Dayak Benuaq ditinjau dari orientasi nilai budaya (Skripsi, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-15

How to Cite

Aulia, A. A. R., Subroto, A., & Utomo, S. (2026). Dualisme Hukum dan Fenomena Underreporting : Studi Sosio-Hukum pada Masyarakat Adat Dayak Benuaq. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 5(4), 2057–2069. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3293