Knowledge Map of Digital Activism and Policy Change: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions

Authors

  • Irwan Ade Saputra Department of Government Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University
  • Indri Syawali Ramadhani Department of Government Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v4i2.1638

Keywords:

Digital Activism, Social Media, Policy Change, Public Policy, Bibliometric Analysis, Science Mapping

Abstract

This study examines the intellectual structure and evolution of research on digital activism and policy change through a bibliometric analysis of 127 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2015 and 2025. Using R-Biblioshiny, the analysis integrates indicators of publication trends, citation patterns, geographical and institutional contributions, and thematic evolution to move beyond descriptive mapping toward deeper interpretive insights. The findings reveal a rapid growth in scholarly output, particularly after 2020, reflecting the increasing centrality of social media in shaping political discourse and policy processes in the digital era. The United States and the United Kingdom emerge as dominant contributors, while countries such as Indonesia, India, and Brazil highlight the growing involvement of the Global South, although regional disparities remain evident. Highly cited sources underscore the multidisciplinary nature of the field, linking communication, public policy, and social movement studies. Thematic mapping identifies social media and digital activism as foundational themes, while human-centered participation and social movements function as key drivers of current research. Thematic evolution further demonstrates a transition from technology-oriented perspectives toward more socially embedded and policy-relevant approaches, particularly those emphasizing public engagement and collective action. This study synthesizes how digital activism has increasingly been conceptualized as a dynamic mechanism influencing policy processes. It also identifies critical gaps, including the limited focus on direct policy outcomes and the lack of longitudinal and comparative analyses. These insights support the development of more integrated, context-sensitive, and evidence-based approaches to understanding digital activism and its policy implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardha Putri, A. S. L. F. N. P. (2024). Mapping The Evolution Of Digital Activism In Global South Societies: A Bibliometric Analysis (2014–2024). Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.278

Asmiyono, E., & Rahmawati, D. E. (2025). Social Movements In The Digital Age: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Strategies And Structures In Achieving Social Change. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 38(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V38I22025.156-169

Cao, X., Zeng, R., & Evans, R. (2022). Digital Activism And Collective Mourning By Chinese Netizens During Covid-19. China Information, 36(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211054172

Cao, X., & Zhang, D. (2025). Creative Digital Resistance On China’s Virtual Wailing Wall. China Information. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X251394685

Chami, G. (2025). Social Media As A Conduit For Civil Society Movements. In From Epic Tales to Digital Trails: Understanding New Mediascapes in Activism (pp. 11–37). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003628910-2

Chandler, D. (2017). Securing The Anthropocene? International Policy Experiments In Digital Hacktivism: A Case Study Of Jakarta. Security Dialogue, 48(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616677714

Chari, T., & Munoriyarwa, A. (2025). Climate Change Communication In Africa Emerging Trends And Practices. In Climate Change Communication in Africa Emerging Trends and Practices. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003660217

Deseriis, M. (2020). Digital Movement Parties: A Comparative Analysis Of The Technopolitical Cultures And The Participation Platforms Of The Movimento 5 Stelle And The Piratenpartei. Information Communication and Society, 23(12), 1770–1786. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631375

du Plessis, C. (2025). Community Autonomy and Centralised Governance: A Textual Case Study Of The Reddit API Virtual Sit-In. In P. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Social Media, ECSM 2025 (pp. 30–37). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.12.1.3274

Fernández-Zubieta, A., Guevara, J. A., Caballero Roldan, R., & Robles, J. M. (2023). Digital Activism Masked―The Fridays For Future Movement And The “Global Day Of Climate Action”: Testing Social Function And Framing Typologies Of Claims On Twitter. Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120676

Ferreira, E., & Silva, M. J. (2025). Gender and Digital Technologies. Encyclopedia, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030111

Gause, L. (2022). The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Political Representation for Marginalized Groups. In The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Political Representation for Marginalized Groups. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070171

Gudalov, M., Kushvaktov, N., Quvvatova, D., Azimova, E., Samatova, N., Yeshmuratova, A., Khudayberdiyev, R., & Usmonova, U. (2025). Analyzing The Role Of Social Movements In Influencing Policy Change In Post-Colonial Uzbekistan. Archives for Technical Sciences, 2(33), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.70102/afts.2025.1833.847

Idowu, D. L. (2022). Digital Activism And Social Change In Africa: Motivations, Outcomes And Constraints. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40(4), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2023.2177627

Kakungulu-Mayambala, R., & Rukundo, S. (2019). Digital Activism And Free Expression In Uganda. African Human Rights Law Journal, 19(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a9

Leonel, R., Rehbein, K., Westermann-Behaylo, M., & Perrault, E. (2024). Firms’ Response to Slacktivism: When and Why are E-Petitions Effective? Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 3148–3183. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13010

Li, D., & Zhang, D. (2024). Innovative Resistance: Understanding Public Sentiment in China’s 5G NIMBY Context. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01942-9

Luk, A. (2024). Public Engagement With Ip Issues Through Digital Activism And Select Committees: A Case Study On The #Brokenrecord Campaigns On Music Streaming. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 14(4), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.04.01

Makpor, M. E. (2025). Bridging The Gender Gap In The Digital Age: The Role Of Digital Governance In Advancing Feminist Futures Post-Beijing+30. Gender and Development, 33(3), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2025.2576316

McDonald, S., Nardi, B., & Tomlinson, B. (2017). Political Realities Of Digital Communication: The Limits Of Value From Digital Messages To Members Of The US Congress. LIMITS 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3080556.3080565

Nanayakkara, A. C., Kumara, B. T. G. S., & Kapila Tharanga Rathnayaka, R. M. (2024). Data Driven Analysis Of Protest Dynamics: Comparing Black Lives Matter Movement 2020 And South African Unrest 2021 On Twitter. 2024 8th SLAAI - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, SLAAI-ICAI 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/SLAAI-ICAI63667.2024.10844959

Ndlovu, J., & Mandiyanike, M. (2025). Gender-Based Violence ‘Matters’: An Analysis Of Conflicting Frames Of Violence In South African Media. Social Sciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120678

Pailey, R. N. (2020). De-Centring The ‘White Gaze’ Of Development. Development and Change, 51(3), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12550

Popescu, M.-M. (2025). Co-Creation And Social Media In Public Policy Development. In P. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Social Media, ECSM 2025 (pp. 205–213). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011599483?origin=resultslist

Pyle, C., Zhang, B. Z., Haimson, O. L., & Andalibi, N. (2024). “I’m Constantly in This Dilemma”: How Migrant Technology Professionals Perceive Social Media Recommendation Algorithms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637342

Rochford, E. (2021). Influencers And Activists: Political Performances In An Increasingly Online World. In Social Media in the 21st Century: Perspectives, Influences and Effects on Well-Being (pp. 1–42). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85116785683?origin=resultslist

Rohid, N., Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., Susilo, D., & Zikri, A. (2025). Digital Activism in Contemporary Islamic Politics: A Critical Analysis of Social Media’s Impact on Islamic Movements. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 208–232. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10159

Schiavi, I., Silveira, S. A. D., & Pasti, A. (2025). Where Does Digital Sovereignty Lie In Building The Brazilian Smart City? Digital Geography and Society, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100137

Seow, H., McMillan, K., Civak, M., Bainbridge, D., van der Wal, A., Haanstra, C., Goldhar, J., & Winemaker, S. (2021). #Caremongering: A Community-Led Social Movement To Address Health And Social Needs During COVID-19. PLoS ONE, 16(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245483

Shaheen, N. L. (2022). Technology Accessibility: How U.S. K-12 Schools Are Enacting Policy And Addressing The Equity Imperative. Computers and Education, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104414

Shahin, S. (2019). Facing Up To Facebook: How Digital Activism, Independent Regulation, And Mass Media Foiled A Neoliberal Threat To Net Neutrality. Information Communication and Society, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340494

Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2022). Digital Citizen Empowerment: A Systematic Literature Review Of Theories And Development Models. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 660–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2046533

Stokes, A. Q., & Atkins-Sayre, W. (2018). PETA, Rhetorical Fracture, And The Power Of Digital Activism. Public Relations Inquiry, 7(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X18770216

Sunday, O., Tommy, S., & Ojila, E. (2025). Soro Soke and the Digital Public Agenda: Making a Case for a New Theorization of Agenda Setting. In Theorizing Nigerian Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Communication, Media, and Culture (pp. 395–417). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97581-3_20

Tang, J. L. (2023). Issue Communication Network Dynamics in Connective Action: The Role of Non-Political Influencers and Regular Users. Social Media and Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177921

Tverdostup, M., Paas, T., & Chebotareva, M. (2022). What can Support Cross-Border Cooperation in the Blue Economy? Lessons from Blue Sector Performance Analysis in Estonia and Finland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031817

von Bülow, M. (2023). Transnational Social Movements in Latin America. In The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements (pp. 521–536). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190870362.013.27

Wahyuningroem, S. L., Sirait, R., Uljanatunnisa, U., & Heryadi, D. (2024). Youth Political Participation And Digital Movement In Indonesia: The Case Of #ReformasiDikorupsi and #TolakOmnibusLaw. F1000Research, 12. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122669.3

Werner, A. (2023). Whatever Happened To The Girl In #MeToo? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30(4), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231206205

Whyte, D., Debaveye, L., Bjørkan, M., Steiro, V. M. D., Marra, M. V., Seys, J. J., Deane, A., Namisnik, W., Pelegrí, J. L., & Simon, C. (2024). Planning For Citizen Participation In The EU Mission To Restore Our Ocean And Waters By 2030. Maritime Studies, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-024-00385-x

Willis, R. A. D. (2025). Hashtag Activism And Women’s Rights: Are Social Media Campaigns Really Making Laws Better For Women And Girls? In Hashtag Activism and Women’s Rights: Are Social Media Campaigns Really Making Laws Better for Women and Girls? Bristol University Press. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004333512?origin=resultslist

Woldearegay, E. (2024). Making Dissent Visible Through Facebook Activism: The Tale Of Three Diasporan Ethiopians. Journal of Global Diaspora and Media, 5(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1386/gdm_00045_1

Yeşilyurt, S., Engin, E., & Akgöz, B. E. (2021). Social Movements Digitalized: Turkish Citizens’ Perception Of And Participation In Online Social Movements. In Paradigm Shifts within the Communication World (pp. 321–339). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85110921669?origin=resultslist

Zhang, R., Liu, L., & Wang, G. (2025). Medical Policy Reform In The Digital Age: Responding To Health Crises Shaped By Internet Public Opinion. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 18, 3387–3396. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S547442

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Saputra, I. A., & Ramadhani, I. S. (2025). Knowledge Map of Digital Activism and Policy Change: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 4(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v4i2.1638