The Effect of Quality of Information System Service on User Satisfaction Through Service Efficiency in A Web-Based Digital Diploma System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i7.3380Keywords:
Quality Information System Service; Service Efficiency; User Satisfaction; Digital DiplomaAbstract
This study was conducted in response to the need to improve the quality of digital academic services in higher education, particularly the issuance and verification of web-based digital diplomas. Accordingly, the study examines how information system service quality affects user satisfaction through service efficiency in the context of a web-based digital diploma system. The study employed a quantitative explanatory model using a cross-sectional approach. The research population consisted of Universitas Ciputra students and alumni, and purposive sampling was used to obtain 95 respondents who had experience using the digital diploma system. The data were analyzed through path analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics, supported by validity testing, reliability testing, classical assumption testing, the Sobel test, and bootstrap confidence intervals. The results show that information system service quality has a positive and significant effect on user satisfaction and service efficiency. Service efficiency also has a positive and significant effect on user satisfaction and significantly mediates the relationship between information system service quality and user satisfaction. The mediation is partial because the direct effect remains significant while the indirect effect through service efficiency is also significant. These findings indicate that a high-quality information system can increase user satisfaction both directly and through more efficient service delivery. Higher education institutions should therefore strengthen the technical quality of digital academic systems and ensure that these systems create effective services in actual practice. Improvements should focus on system usability, reliability, security, accuracy, process simplification, error reduction, and responsive helpdesk support. A web-based digital diploma system should consequently be viewed not merely as a tool for document digitization, but also as a strategic instrument for institutional digital transformation and the improvement of academic service quality.
Downloads
References
Arbain, M. A., Rizqa, M., Irma, A., & Putri, N. A. (2024). Tantangan dan peluang teknologi informasi dalam meningkatkan efisiensi administrasi pendidikan. PANDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak dan Pendidikan Umum, 2(2), 23–28.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Hakim, H. Q. I., Bilqis, S. S., Ramadhani, R., & Vindua, R. (2025). Tinjauan Literatuur: Efektivitas Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Web di Perguruan Tinggi. JUTECH: Journal Education and Technology.
Juniarta, G. A., Heryanda, K. K., & Suwena, K. R. (2025). Peran Kualitas Pelayanan, Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi, dan Harapan Mahasiswa terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen. Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship: The innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Routledge.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kurniawan, A., & Fitriani, D. (2022). Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Sistem Tanda Tangan Digital pada Dokumen Akademik Menggunakan Metode
Kusuma, K., Utami, C. W., & Padmalia, M. (2018). Pemediasian kepuasan konsumen pada pengaruh kualitas layanan dan harga terhadap minat beli ulang perusahaan Sinar Karya Pemenang. Jurnal Performa: Jurnal Manajemen dan Start-Up Bisnis, 3(3), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.37715/jp.v3i3.725
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson.
Moeheriono. (2012). Pengukuran kinerja berbasis kompetensi. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships.
Prasetio, L., Assegaff, S., & Kurniabudi. (2025). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Kualitas Layanan Sistem Informasi Akademik Fuzzy Servqual. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (JMS).
Pratama, R., dkk. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Digital terhadap Kepuasan Alumni di Era Transformasi Digital. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1).
Pratama, R. A. (2021). Pengaruh kualitas layanan elektronik terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa pada perguruan tinggi swasta. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 45–57.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
Salim, M., Ali, H., & Yulisetiarini, D. (2021). The role of system quality, information quality, service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 755–764.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211.
Setiadi, B., Kraugusteeliana, K., Risdwiyanto, A., Bakri, A. A., & Arief, I. (2023). The application of Delone and Mclean framework to analyze the relationship between customer satisfaction and user experience of mobile application. Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, 5(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.37034/jsisfotek.v5i1.207
Simon, K., Utami, C. W., & Padmalia, M. (2016). Pengaruh kualitas layanan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan Surya Nalendra Sejahtera Tours & Travel. Jurnal Performa: Jurnal Manajemen dan Start-Up Bisnis, 1(3), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.37715/jp.v1i3.182
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanto, A. (2020). Digitalisasi layanan akademik dan pengaruhnya terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 16(2), 123–134.
Wijaya, T. (2022). Inovasi administrasi kampus dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan akademik. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 14(3), 210–221.
Sevilla, C. G., Ochave, J. A., Punsalan, T. G., Regala, B. P., & Uriarte, G. G. (1992). An Introduction to Research Methods. Rex Bookstore.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ECONOMINA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
