Penentuan Prioritas Lahan Sawah Penerima Bantuan Pompa Air Menggunakan Metode SMART

Selviana Putri Wulandari; Mardiawati; Alders Paliling

doi:10.55681/armada.v4i10.4890

Authors

Selviana Putri Wulandari Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia
Mardiawati Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia
Alders Paliling Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i10.4890

Keywords:

Bantuan Pompa Air, Lahan Sawah, Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria, Prioritas, SMART

Abstract

Penentuan penerima bantuan pompa air memerlukan penilaian yang mempertimbangkan kebutuhan pengairan, cakupan manfaat, dan kesiapan pengelolaan. Penggunaan satu indikator berpotensi mengabaikan perbedaan kondisi antarhamparan sawah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menyusun model penentuan prioritas lahan sawah penerima bantuan pompa air menggunakan metode Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Penelitian menggunakan studi simulasi terhadap sepuluh alternatif hamparan sawah dengan lima kriteria, yaitu tingkat kekurangan air, luas lahan yang dapat dilayani, jumlah petani penerima manfaat, keterbatasan sarana pengairan, dan kesiapan pengelolaan. Tahapan analisis meliputi penetapan kriteria, normalisasi bobot, transformasi nilai menjadi utilitas, agregasi nilai tertimbang, dan pengujian sensitivitas. Hasil perhitungan menempatkan alternatif A7 pada peringkat pertama dengan nilai 0,7640, diikuti A1 sebesar 0,5967 dan A5 sebesar 0,5927. Perubahan bobot tingkat kekurangan air dari 0,20 hingga 0,40 mempertahankan A7 sebagai prioritas pertama, tetapi mengubah urutan beberapa alternatif lainnya. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa SMART dapat menghasilkan rekomendasi prioritas yang transparan dan mudah ditelusuri. Penerapan pada program bantuan memerlukan verifikasi kelayakan teknis, penetapan bobot bersama pemangku kepentingan, dan pengujian menggunakan data lapangan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chu, L., Ma, R., Bi, L., & Chen, D. (2025). Characterization of soil preferential flow in the paddy field-ridge transition zone of terrace, Southwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 322, 110019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.110019

Dimyati, M., Rustanto, A., Ash Shidiq, I. P., Indratmoko, S., Siswanto, Dimyati, R. D., Nurlambang, T., Zubair, A., Fakhruddin, A., Siddiq, A., Adhanto, D. H., Maulidina, K., & Auni, R. (2024). Spatiotemporal relation of satellite-based meteorological to agricultural drought in the downstream Citarum watershed, Indonesia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 22, 100339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100339

Echeverría-Progulakis, S., Martínez-Eixarch, M., Boix, D., Llevat, R., Jornet, L., Arias, J. N., Catala-Forner, M., & Pérez-Méndez, N. (2025). Water-saving irrigation can mitigate climate change but entails negative side effects on biodiversity in rice paddy fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 391, 109719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109719

Hashemi, S.-Z., Darzi-Naftchali, A., Karandish, F., Ritzema, H., & Solaimani, K. (2024). Enhancing agricultural sustainability with water and crop management strategies in modern irrigation and drainage networks. Agricultural Water Management, 305, 109110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109110

Hatta, M., Sulakhudin, Burhansyah, R., Kifli, G. C., Dewi, D. O., Kilmanun, J. C., Permana, D., Supriadi, K., Warman, R., Azis, H., Santari, P. T., & Widiastuti, D. P. (2023). Food self-sufficiency: Managing the newly-opened tidal paddy fields for rice farming in Indonesia (A case study in West Kalimantan, Indonesia). Heliyon, 9(3), e13839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13839

Hu, X., Chen, M., Luo, Y., & Corbari, C. (2025). Paddy field irrigation forecast based on a satellite data driven energy water balance model. Agricultural Water Management, 321, 109945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109945

Hua, K., He, J., Liao, B., He, T., Yang, P., & Zhang, L. (2023). Multi-objective decision-making for efficient utilization of water and fertilizer in paddy fields: A case study in Southern China. Agricultural Water Management, 289, 108507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108507

Jorge-García, D., Estruch-Guitart, V., & Aragonés-Beltrán, P. (2023). How geographical factors and decision-makers’ perceptions influence the prioritization of ecosystem services: Analysis in the Spanish rice field areas in RAMSAR Mediterranean wetlands. Science of The Total Environment, 869, 161823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161823

Kizielewicz, B., Tomczyk, T., Gandor, M., & Sałabun, W. (2024). Subjective weight determination methods in multi-criteria decision-making: a systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 5396–5407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.673

Li, Q., Dai, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, F., Cui, Y., Luo, Y., & Hao, J. (2026). Classification of paddy field water conditions with unmanned aerial vehicle: A novel method incorporating the short-wave infrared band. Agricultural Water Management, 333, 110626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110626

Li, Y., Wu, M., Adamowski, J. F., & Cao, X. (2024). Blue-green water migration and utilization efficiency under various irrigation-drainage measures applied to a paddy field. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 51, 101641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101641

Liu, J., Shao, D., Gu, W., Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Tang, C., Wang, H., Feng, J., & Liu, J. (2025). Effect of drainage water recycling system management on nutrient load reduction in rice-based irrigation areas. Agricultural Water Management, 317, 109648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109648

Mahendra, G. S., Wardoyo, R., Pasrun, Y. P., Sudipa, I G. I., Khairunnisa, Putra, I N. T. A., Wiguna, I K. A. G., Aristamy, I G. A. A. M., Kharisma, L. P. I., Sutoyo, M. N., Sarasvananda, I B. G., Sumpala M, A. T., Rasyid, R., & Wahyudi, F. (2023). Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Teori & Studi Kasus. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Martin, D. M., & Smith, D. R. (2025). Comparing SMART and ELECTRE methods for multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study evaluating conservation strategies. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 27, 100764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100764

Mascherpa, P., Rienzner, M., Tkachenko, D., Garza, R., Brandalese, F., Naldi, E., Gandolfi, C., & Facchi, A. (2026). SmartWT: An open IoT sensor, datalogger and GPRS data transmission device for monitoring water levels in rice fields, with application to AWD irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 241, 111324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111324

Nie, T., Zhang, P., Chen, P., Liu, H., Jiang, L., Sun, Z., Yin, S., Wang, T., Li, T., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Impacts of climate change and water–fertilizer management on water balance dynamics in transplanting and direct–seeded paddy fields. Climate Smart Agriculture, 2(3), 100070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2025.100070

Nishikiori, T., Kubota, T., & Fujimura, S. (2024). Constructing a map of potassium inputs to paddy fields from irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 295, 108738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108738

O’Shea, R., Deeney, P., Triantaphyllou, E., Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Armagan Tarim, S. (2026). Weight stability intervals for multi-criteria decision analysis using the weighted sum model. Expert Systems with Applications, 296, 128460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128460

Sáenz-Royo, C., & Chiclana, F. (2025). The value of expert judgments in decision support systems. Applied Soft Computing, 171, 112806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112806

Shekhovtsov, A. (2023). Evaluating the Performance of Subjective Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making using a novel Weights Similarity Coefficient. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 4785–4794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.478

Sudipa, I G. I., Kharisma, L. P. I., Fajriana, Khairunnisa, Waas, D. V., Sari, F., Sutoyo, M. N., Rusliyadi, M., Setiawan, I., Martaseli, E., Sandhiyasa, I M. S., Sulistianto SW, & Winarno, E. (2023). Penerapan decision support system (DSS) dalam berbagai bidang (Revolusi Industri 4.0 menuju era Society 5.0). PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Sutoyo, M. N. (2024). Komparatif Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weighted Product (WP) dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Bianglala Informatika, 12(2), 88–94.

Tian, R., Takaki, K., Iida, T., Noda, K., & Asada, Y. (2026). An optimization framework for intelligent irrigation system installation in fragmented paddy fields. Smart Agricultural Technology, 13, 101740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101740

Więckowski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2025). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-Based framework for supply chain management evaluation with multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis: A green logistics perspective. Applied Soft Computing, 185, 113879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113879

Xing, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, W., & Liu, L. (2025). Promising water-saving strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions while ensuring rice yield in paddy fields: Evidences from a global meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 321, 109949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109949

Zhang, Q., Sun, J., Dai, C., Zhang, G., & Wu, Y. (2024). Sustainable development of groundwater resources under the large-scale conversion of dry land into rice fields. Agricultural Water Management, 298, 108851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108851