Analisis Perbedaan Dimensi Bangunan Bertingkat Terhadap Beban Gempa Dengan Analisis Pushover Menggunakan Program Sap2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v4i1.1893Keywords:
Gempa, Pushover analysis, Kinerja strukturAbstract
Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, merupakan wilayah rawan gempa sehingga analisis ketahanan struktur bangunan menjadi sangat penting. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kinerja seismik gedung RSU PKU Dr. Soemowidagdo Boyolali dengan metode pushover analysis berbasis perangkat lunak SAP2000 sesuai standar ATC-40. Fokus kajian meliputi kapasitas struktur terhadap beban gempa, pola terbentuknya sendi plastis, serta penentuan level kinerja bangunan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan sendi plastis pertama muncul pada langkah ke-3 dari arah X dan Y. Kapasitas maksimum yang mampu ditahan adalah 12.582,126 kN dengan perpindahan 0,181322 m untuk push X, dan 10.870,354 kN dengan perpindahan 0,239292 m untuk push Y. Berdasarkan batasan rasio drift ATC-40, struktur mencapai level Damage Control (DC), artinya gedung masih dapat menahan gaya gempa dengan kerusakan ringan dan penurunan kekakuan, namun tetap memiliki margin keamanan yang memadai.
Downloads
References
Aljawhari, A., Mwafy, A., & Al-Mahaidi, R. (2020). Performance-based assessment of reinforced concrete buildings designed to different seismic codes. Structures, 28, 1612–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.042
Azimi, M., & Peyghaleh, E. (2021). Nonlinear static pushover analysis of RC frames with different height configurations. Structures, 33, 3871–3884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.032
Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2020). Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures for estimating seismic deformation demands. Earthquake Spectra, 36(4), 1955–1978. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020937668
Cimellaro, G. P., Malavisi, M., & Mahin, S. (2020). Seismic resilience of healthcare facilities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49(9), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3260
Cummins, P. R. (2021). Subduction zone hazards in Southeast Asia. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00146-x
Dya, A. F. C., & Oreta, A. W. C. (2022). Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings using nonlinear static analysis. Engineering Structures, 252, 113676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113676
Ferreira, T. M., Vicente, R., & Varum, H. (2021). Seismic vulnerability assessment of hospital buildings. Engineering Structures, 242, 112519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112519
Hajirasouliha, I., & Pilakoutas, K. (2020). Seismic assessment of irregular multistory buildings using pushover analysis. Engineering Structures, 210, 110395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110395
Kalkan, E., & Chopra, A. K. (2021). Modal pushover analysis for estimating seismic demands of buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50(5), 1358–1375. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3371
Kazemi, M., Behnamfar, F., & Zargar, M. (2021). Seismic performance levels of reinforced concrete buildings under near-fault ground motions. Structures, 30, 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.063
Mwafy, A., Al-Mahaidi, R., & Aljawhari, A. (2020). Seismic vulnerability assessment of multistory RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 224, 111219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111219
Nguyen, D. D., Nguyen, P. C., & Tran, T. T. (2021). Seismic performance of RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 145, 106709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106709
Nouri, G. R., & Tavakoli, H. R. (2022). Influence of building height on seismic response of RC moment frames using pushover analysis. Structures, 36, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.021
Ozturk, B., & Turk, A. M. (2023). Performance-based seismic assessment of RC buildings with varying geometric dimensions. Structures, 47, 1135–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.019
Pitilakis, K., Riga, E., & Fotopoulou, S. (2020). Seismic response of structures founded on soft soils. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 5659–5683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00873-4
Rai, D. C., & Singh, Y. (2020). Performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24(9), 1503–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1511797
Shrestha, B., Hao, H., & Bi, K. (2022). Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures, 256, 113997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113997
Silva, V., Crowley, H., Pagani, M., Monelli, D., & Pinho, R. (2020). Development of a global seismic risk model. Earthquake Spectra, 36(1_suppl), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020931862
Tesfamariam, S., & Goda, K. (2021). Seismic risk assessment of buildings considering structural uncertainties. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 205, 107210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107210
Widiyantoro, S., Gunawan, E., & Rawlinson, N. (2020). Complex subduction zone structure beneath Indonesia. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(18), e2020GL089211. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089211
Zareian, F., & Krawinkler, H. (2020). Simplified performance-based earthquake engineering framework. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49(10), 1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3274
Zhong, S., Gardoni, P., & Rosowsky, D. (2022). Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Structural Safety, 96, 102192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102192
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-01-31 (2)
- 2026-02-26 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





