Evaluation of the Teacher Mobilizer Program at the Junior High School Level in Sleman Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2936Keywords:
Evaluation, Teacher Mobilizer Program, Junior High SchoolAbstract
This study aims to evaluate: (1) the context of the Teacher Mobilizer Program at the junior high school level in Sleman Regency, (2) the input of the program, (3) the implementation process, and (4) the product or outcomes of the program. This study employs an evaluative research method with a qualitative approach. The research was conducted at SMP Negeri 3 Turi, SMP Negeri 1 Pakem, and SMP Negeri 1 Cangkringan, involving four Teacher Mobilizers (three of whom serve as principals) and three fellow teachers as informants. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation studies. Data analysis used the Miles and Huberman model, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that: (1) the program is relevant to the educational needs in Sleman Regency, especially in addressing one-way learning practices that are not student-centered; (2) in terms of input, teacher readiness is generally good, although infrastructure and technology support remain uneven; (3) the implementation process is effective, but there are inconsistencies between field practices and implementation guidelines, as well as variations in quality across learning groups; and (4) the program has improved teacher competence and paradigms, although the sustainability of practices and the equitable distribution of impact still need improvement.
References
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B. B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman.
Dewi, P. L. A., Ratnaya, I. G., & Nugraha, I. N. P. (2025). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Learning Management System dalam Program Pendidikan Guru Penggerak: Studi Kasus Balai Guru Penggerak Provinsi Bali. JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan), 8(1), 772–776. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i1.6786
Diao, C., Zhou, X., Mao, Q., & Hong, J. (2022). The development of transformative agency of teachers in teaching research activities in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 724175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724175
Efendi, U. P., Wibowo, S. E., Sartono, E. K. E., & Lena, M. S. (2024). The effectiveness of differentiated instruction in elementary school subject: Teachers’ perceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(3), 1784–1799. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i3.2024121
Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2024). Cultivating teacher leadership: Evidence from a transformative professional development model. School Leadership & Management, 44(4), 413–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2024.2328056
Gregory, A., Huang, F. L., & Ward-Seidel, A. R. (2024). Adolescent exposure to restorative practices and their perceptions of support, structure, and bullying in the school climate. AERA Open, 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241288525
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT, 39(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964
Huang, J., & Yip, J. W. C. (2021). Understanding ESL teachers’ agency in their early years of professional development: A three-layered triadic reciprocity framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 739271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739271
Huijboom, F., Van Meeuwen, P., Rusman, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2021). Professional learning communities (PLCs) as learning environments for teachers: An in-depth examination of the development of seven PLCs and influencing factors. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, Article 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100566
Kasmaini, K., Hamzah, S., & Winarto, H. (2023). CIPP evaluation model: Online in-service teachers training program conducted at English Language Education Study Program of Bengkulu University. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.5871
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research.
Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
Kurteshi, V., Bunjaku-Isufi, M., & Rrustemi, J. (2025). The need for professional development in improving teaching practices in primary schools in Kosovo. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1567515. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1567515
Meesuk, P., Wongrugsa, A., & Wangkaewhiran, T. (2021). Sustainable teacher professional development through professional learning community: PLC. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0015
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.
Mughni, M. S. (2024). Amplifikasi Profesi Guru Dalam Proses Pendidikan Transformatif Perspektif Al-Ghazali. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3).
Muthiah, N. (2021). Evaluasi Program Guru Penggerak.
Nurhayati, N., Hartati, L., & Suharyati, H. (2024). Efektifitas Program Guru Penggerak dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan sekolah dasar di Indonesia: Analisis data driven. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(9), 10473–10479.
Sang, G. (2020). Teacher Agency. In Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer Nature Singapore.
Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., & Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar Di Indonesia. JURNAL DINAMIKA PENDIDIKAN, 14(2).
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation.
Sujana, I. W. C. (2019). Fungsi Dan Tujuan Pendidikan Indonesia. Adi Widya Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v4i1.927
Ulla, T., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2023). Program support matters: A systematic review on teacher- and school-related contextual factors facilitating the implementation of social-emotional learning programs. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 965538. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.965538
Vičič Krabonja, M., Kustec, S., Skrbinjek, V., Aberšek, B., & Flogie, A. (2024). Innovative professional learning communities and sustainable education practices through digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146250
Vincent, C. G., McClure, H. H., Marquez, B., & Goodrich, D. (2021). Designing professional development in restorative practices: Assessing high school personnel’s, students’, and parents’ perceptions of discipline practices. NASSP Bulletin, 105(4), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365211045461
Wang, L. (2022). English language teacher agency in response to curriculum reform in China: An ecological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 935038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935038.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wira Berkat Anugerah Halawa, Priadi Surya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
