Responsibility of the Director of a Limited Liability Company who has resigned from the implementation of the EGMS based on Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies

Authors

  • Edward Venansius Mao Goa Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
  • Christine S.T. Kansil Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2803

Keywords:

Board of Directors, Legal Responsibility, EGMS, Limited Liability Company, Legal Certainty, Shareholders

Abstract

Limited Liability Companies as a legal entity that adheres to a three-tier board system consisting of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), the Board of Directors, and the Board of Commissioners require clear legal certainty regarding the division of authority and responsibility of each organ. One of the legal issues that often arise in practice is regarding the status and responsibilities of the Board of Directors who have submitted their resignation in relation to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS). This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of the Board of Directors who have resigned from the implementation of the EGMS and to examine the legal certainty for shareholders on the EGMS held by the Board of Directors during the transition period, based on Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a case approach. The results of the study show that the resignation of the Board of Directors does not necessarily relieve the person concerned from his legal obligations and responsibilities. During the transition period until the GMS accepts or decides on the resignation, the Board of Directors remains obliged to carry out its duties, including facilitating the implementation of the EGMS; Negligence in this case can give rise to civil liability that cannot be avoided by taking refuge behind the doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule. Legal certainty for majority shareholders is realized through the guarantee of the validity of EGMS resolutions held by the Board of Directors during the transition period as long as all formal and procedural requirements are met, while legal certainty for minority shareholders is realized through protection instruments in the form of the right to sue for annulment of the GMS resolution, appraisal rights, and alternative EGMS implementation mechanisms through the Board of Commissioners or court determinations.

References

Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58

Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. (2015). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0129

Almeida, H., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2637–2680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01001.x

Armour, J., Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2017). Agency problems and legal strategies. Oxford University Press.

Bainbridge, S. M. (2008). Corporation law and economics. Foundation Press.

Beekes, W., Brown, P., Zhan, W., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Corporate governance, companies' disclosure practices, and market transparency. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(3–4), 263–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12187

Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121

Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2

Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.03.002

Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2007). Law and the market: The impact of enforcement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(2), 229–311.

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007

Eisenberg, M. A. (1993). An overview of the principles of corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(4), 1271–1282.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201424320

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721991658

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Keay, A. (2014). Directors' duties (2nd ed.). Jordan Publishing.

Kershaw, D. (2012). Company law in context: Text and materials. Oxford University Press.

Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2), 331–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.2.331

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research. Management Decision, 60(13), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2021-0132

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9

Macey, J. R. (2008). Corporate governance: Promises kept, promises broken. Princeton University Press.

Mallin, C. A. (2019). Corporate governance (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Legal research (Revised edition). Kencana.

Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431252

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.001

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ed750b30-en

Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Normative legal research: A brief review. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Solomon, J. (2020). Corporate governance and accountability (5th ed.). Wiley.

Tricker, B. (2019). Corporate governance: Principles, policies and practices (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. (2007). Statute Book of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 Number 106.

Velasco, J. (2009). How many fiduciary duties are there in corporate law? Southern California Law Review, 83(6), 1231–1310.

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Yani, A., & Widjaja, G. (2006). Limited liability company. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Edward Venansius Mao Goa, & Kansil, C. S. (2026). Responsibility of the Director of a Limited Liability Company who has resigned from the implementation of the EGMS based on Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2803