The Dynamics of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) Interpersonal Metafunction in Understanding Students’ Desires in Indonesian Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2795Keywords:
Classroom interaction, Interpersonal function, Systemic functional linguisticsAbstract
This research aims to analyze teachers' linguistic strategies in understanding the desires of eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 8 Denpasar using a Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) approach. The primary focus of this study is the interpersonal metafunction of language, specifically within teacher-student interactions during the learning process. The method employed is a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design, utilizing data collection techniques such as participatory observation, interviews, and documentation. The results indicate that students' desires are often not stated explicitly but are instead expressed through indirect utterances, such as questions, complaints, or emotional expressions. Teachers who possess linguistic sensitivity and implement communication strategies based on interpersonal metafunctions encompassing mood, modality, and residue are able to respond to such utterances empathetically and functionally. The strategies utilized by teachers include affirmation, light humor, emotional validation, and reflective questioning. This study concludes that the application of SFL in classroom communication practices can strengthen interpersonal relationships, create a supportive learning environment, and encourage active student participation. The findings of this research are expected to serve as a guideline for teachers in understanding students' needs and desires within the pedagogical.
References
Devilito, R., & Saddhono, K. (2016). Pembelajaran Linguistik (Bahasa) untuk Meminimalisasi Kesalahan Pemakaian Bahasa oleh Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra), 1(1), 1–7.
Effendy, O. U. (2003). Teori Dan Konsep Komunikasi. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Maulani, G., Wachyudi, K., Astuty, H. S., Saptadi, N. T. S., Hayati, R., Tandirerung, V. A., Nababan, H. S., Iskandar, R., Arribathi, A. H., Saniah, N., Mayasari, Susilawati, E., Usnur, U. H., Hadikusumo, R. A., Siregar, R. W., & Rasmita. (2023). Komunikasi Pendidikan. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Nurhidayah. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Revita, Y., Marsidin, S., & Sulastri, S. (2023). Peran Bahasa dalam Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Journal on Education, 5(2), 2981–2987. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.949
Santoso, A. (2008). Jejak Halliday dalam Linguistik Kritis dan Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bahasa dan Seni, 36(1), 1–14. https://sastra.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Jejak-Halliday-dalam-Linguistik-Kritis-dan-Analisis-Wacana-Kritis-Anang-Santoso.pdf
Suhardi. (2017). Menguak Linguistik Pendidikan dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa Dan Sastra (hlm. 308). Universitas Diponegoro.
Utari, A. R. P., Mujiyanto, J., Fitriati, S. W., & Prasetyo, A. S. (2022). Komunikasi Interpersonal Dosen dan Mahasiswa Dalam Ujian Tugas Akhir. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (SNPASCA) UNNES, 30–34. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/1424
Wulansari, A. (2016). Analisis Wacana ‘What’s Up With Monas?’ Dengan Pendekatan Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12(2), 29–45.
Yasin, M. (2019). Komunikasi Pendidikan Menuju Pembelajaran Efektif (A. Purwowidodo, Ed.). STAIN Kediri Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Dewa Gede Fathur Try Githa, Ida Bagus Putrayasa, Ni Ketut Widiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




