Cross-Sector Collaboration in Public Service Innovation: The Implementation of the One Baby Three Documents Program in Bintan Regency

Authors

  • Assun Ani Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia
  • Armauliza Septiawan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia
  • Okparizan Okparizan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2716

Keywords:

Public Service Innovation, Sustainable Healthcare Services, Collaboration, Civil Registration, Integrated Services

Abstract

Public service innovation is an important strategy for improving integrated and sustainable healthcare services. This study analyses healthcare service innovation through the One Baby Three Documents Program at Kelong Public Health Centre, Bintan Regency. It used a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. Data were analysed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, while Osborne and Brown’s public innovation theory served as the analytical framework, covering dynamic capability, adaptability, collaboration, learning organisation, and co-production. The findings show that the program integrates maternal and child healthcare services with civil registration services by issuing three essential documents, namely Birth Certificate, Family Card, and Child Identity Card, within one service process. Its implementation is supported by organisational adaptability, cross-sector collaboration, continuous staff capacity building, and community participation. During 2023 to 2024, the program served 109 newborns and improved early access to civil registration documents. However, limited digital infrastructure and suboptimal public participation remain key challenges. This study concludes that the program represents a sustainable healthcare service innovation through service integration and inter-agency collaboration.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Publi Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2009). Public Management and Governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead Long live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Kettunen, P., & Kallio, J. (2019). Citizen participation and public service innovation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 655–667.

Mergel, I. (2019). Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Moore, M. H. (2013). Recognizing Public Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.

Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK. The Word That Would Be King? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Public Management Review, 15(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.757563

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis into the Age of Austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Revised ed.). New York: Doubleday.

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

United Nations. (2023). E-Government Survey 2023: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Development. New York: United Nations.

Van de Walle, S., & Groeneveld, S. (2020). Public service performance and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 3–20.

World Health Organization. (2022). Strengthening Primary Health Care through Integrated Services. Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organization. (2023). Global Health Observatory Report 2023. Geneva: WHO.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand, CA: Sage Publications.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE).

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Transformasi Sistem Kesehatan Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2023). Pedoman Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan Terintegrasi. Jakarta: Kemendagri.

Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Bintan. (2024). Laporan Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan Tahun 2024. Bintan: Disdukcapil Kabupaten Bintan.

UPTD Puskesmas Kelong. (2024). Laporan Program Satu Bayi Tiga Dokumen Tahun 2024. Bintan: UPTD Puskesmas Kelong.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ani, A., Septiawan, A., & Okparizan, O. (2026). Cross-Sector Collaboration in Public Service Innovation: The Implementation of the One Baby Three Documents Program in Bintan Regency. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2716