Effectiveness of Complete Systematic Land Registration Services (PTSL) at ATR/BPN Sukabumi City Land Office From 2022-2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2259Keywords:
Agrarian Affairs, Comprehensive Systematic Land Registration, Effectiveness, Land Registration, National Land AgencyAbstract
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) services at the ATR/BPN Sukabumi City Land Office during 2022–2024. This research was motivated by the fact that there are still many community land parcels that have not been certified and the uneven achievement of the PTSL program in several areas of Sukabumi City. This study employed a qualitative method with a descriptive approach through observation, interviews, and documentation techniques. The informants consisted of the Head of the ATR/BPN Sukabumi City Land Office, PTSL implementation officers, and community members participating in the PTSL program. The study used Nugroho’s (2020) policy effectiveness theory which includes appropriate policy, appropriate implementation, appropriate target, appropriate environment, and appropriate process. The results showed that the PTSL service program at the ATR/BPN Sukabumi City Land Office has generally been quite effective, as reflected in the suitability of policies with community needs, the implementation of the program according to procedures, the increase in land certification realization in 2023 and 2024, as well as support from the government and community participation in program implementation. However, several obstacles remain, such as the lack of public understanding regarding administrative requirements, limited human resources, and uneven program achievements in several regions. Therefore, increased socialization, coordination, and equal distribution of program implementation are needed to optimize the effectiveness of PTSL services further.
References
Abubakari, Z., Richter, C., & Zevenbergen, J. (2018). Making space legible: Cadastres and urban planning in informal settlements. Habitat International, 79, 81–90.
Aditya, T., et al. (2020). Participatory land administration and cadastral mapping in Indonesia. Land Use Policy.
Aditya, T., et al. (2021). Systematic land registration and cadastral data quality in Indonesia. Land Use Policy.
Bromley, D. W. (2009). Formalising property relations in the developing world: The wrong prescription for the wrong malady. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.003
Cahyono, B. K., & Deviantari, U. W. (2018). Public participation in land registration program in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2009). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp007
Enemark, S., Bell, K. C., Lemmen, C., & McLaren, R. (2014). Fit-for-purpose land administration. International Federation of Surveyors.
Fayyad, M., & Al-Sinnawi, A. (2023). Land administration systems and cadastral data quality. Land Use Policy.
Feder, G., & Nishio, A. (1998). The benefits of land registration and titling: Economic and social perspectives. Land Use Policy, 15(1), 25–43.
Forero, R., Nahidi, S., De Costa, J., Mohsin, M., Fitzgerald, G., Gibson, N., McCarthy, S., & Aboagye-Sarfo, P. (2018). Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2
Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02
Ghebru, H., & Lambrecht, I. (2017). Drivers of perceived land tenure (in)security: Empirical evidence from Ghana. Land Use Policy, 66, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.042
Hendriks, B., Zevenbergen, J., Bennett, R., & Antonio, D. (2019). Pro-poor land administration: Towards practical, coordinated, and scalable recording systems for all. Land Use Policy, 81, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.033
Jahani, S., et al. (2024). Digital transformation and land administration effectiveness. Land Use Policy.
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Kusmiarto, K., Aditya, T., Djurdjani, & Subaryono. (2021). Digital transformation of land administration in Indonesia. Land Use Policy.
Lemmen, C., van Oosterom, P., & Bennett, R. (2015). The land administration domain model. Land Use Policy, 49, 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.014
Lengoiboni, M., Richter, C., & Zevenbergen, J. (2019). Land administration and tenure security. Land Use Policy.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. (2022). Data implementation of PTSL in Sukabumi City 2022. ATR/BPN.
Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. (2023). Data implementation of PTSL in Sukabumi City 2023. ATR/BPN.
Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. (2024). Data implementation of PTSL in Sukabumi City 2024. ATR/BPN.
Mubarok, S., Zauhar, S., Setyowati, E., & Suryadi, S. (2020). Policy implementation analysis: Exploration of George Edward III, Marilee S. Grindle, and Mazmanian and Sabatier theories. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 5(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2020.005.01.7
Nugroho, R. (2020). Public policy. Elex Media Komputindo.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Payne, G. (2009). Urban land tenure and property rights in developing countries. Habitat International.
Putera, R. E., et al. (2023). Public policy implementation and local government performance. Public Policy and Administration.
Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3C334::AID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO;2-G
Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. P. (2004). Evaluation of land administration systems. Land Use Policy, 21(4), 371–380.
Tan, E., et al. (2021). Land administration, digital cadastral systems, and public service delivery. Land Use Policy.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
Williamson, I. P. (2001). Land administration “best practice” providing the infrastructure for land policy implementation. Land Use Policy, 18(4), 297–307.
Yubaidi, R. S. (2020). The role of land registration in providing legal certainty in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change.
Zevenbergen, J., Augustinus, C., Antonio, D., & Bennett, R. (2013). Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. Land Use Policy, 31, 595–604.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mutia Siti Damayanti, Yana Fajar FY Basori, Dian Purwanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
