Ambiguitas Status Hukum Santri sebagai Relawan dalam Pekerjaan Konstruksi Pesantren: Perspektif Perlindungan Anak dan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan

Authors

  • Fajar Pradita Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif, Sidoarjo, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Heru Romadhon Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif, Sidoarjo, Indonesia
  • Dhofirul Yahya Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif, Sidoarjo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2168

Keywords:

Santri, Volunteers, Employment Relationship, Legal Protection, Islamic Boarding School

Abstract

The involvement of students (santri) in the construction of Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) is often positioned as voluntary or religious service activities. However, in practice, such involvement frequently contains elements of command, task allocation, and occupational risk that resemble an employment relationship. This condition creates ambiguity regarding the legal status of santri and potentially leads to a lack of legal protection, particularly when workplace accidents occur during construction activities. This study aims to analyze the legal status of santri involved in pesantren construction and the implications for legal responsibility related to occupational safety and child protection. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that the involvement of santri in construction activities that involve elements of instruction, supervision, and division of labor may indicate the existence of an employment relationship under labor law, thereby creating legal obligations regarding occupational safety and potential liability for pesantren management. This study provides a legal analytical framework for defining the boundary between religious volunteer activities and employment relationships that carry legal responsibilities for pesantren, particularly in the context of child protection and occupational safety in construction activities.

References

Bessell, S. (2023). Child labour, social protection, and children's rights. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Hadjon, P. M. (2021). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ibrahim, J. (2021). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

International Labour Organization. (2021). Global estimates of child labour: Results and trends 2016–2020. International Labour Office.

Khakim, A. (2021). Pengantar hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Rahardjo, S. (2022). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Santoso, B. (2021). Hukum ketenagakerjaan dan perlindungan pekerja. Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2023). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.

UNICEF. (2022). Child labour and children’s rights: International perspectives. UNICEF.

Wijayanti, A. (2023). Hukum ketenagakerjaan pasca reformasi. Sinar Grafika.

Zainuddin, A. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 tentang Pesantren.

Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Perppu Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.

United Nations. (2021). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Pradita, F., Heru Romadhon, A., & Yahya, D. (2026). Ambiguitas Status Hukum Santri sebagai Relawan dalam Pekerjaan Konstruksi Pesantren: Perspektif Perlindungan Anak dan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2168