Debtor's Responsibility For Land Certificate Owned By Third Party As Substitute Collateral In Bank
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v3i1.1509Keywords:
Responsibility, Mortgage, CollateralAbstract
The purpose of writing this journal is to examine and analyze the responsibility of debtors toward the owners of land title certificates that are used as replacement collateral in bank credit agreements. The central problem discussed in this paper is the extent to which debtors are legally accountable to third-party landowners whose property has been pledged as collateral. This issue is crucial because, in practice, many debtors lack sufficient assets to secure loans and therefore rely on third parties who voluntarily provide their land ownership certificates to support the debtor’s credit application. In conducting this research, the method employed is a normative juridical approach, which relies on the study of positive law applicable in Indonesia. The analysis is based on primary sources such as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Civil Code, relevant statutory regulations, and specifically the Mortgage Law (Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan). In addition, the research is supported by secondary sources, including expert legal opinions, academic literature, and jurisprudence, which provide interpretation and context for the application of these legal provisions. This study places emphasis on the importance of legal protection for third-party owners who provide collateral. The findings conclude that debtors are obligated to assume full responsibility for third-party property pledged as collateral. If the debtor fails to meet contractual obligations, the debtor may face sanctions or penalties, as such violations constitute a breach of contract under Indonesian law.
References
Ananda, R., Putri, Y., & Saputra, H. (2023). Legal certainty in the implementation of mortgage rights in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Society, 6(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230602.12
Ginting, A., & Hutapea, R. (2018). The role of financial institutions in supporting economic development. Journal of Economic Studies, 10(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15294/jes.v10i1.15432
Handayani, T. (2021). Protection of third parties in credit agreements with mortgage collateral. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy, 5(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijlp.23456
Khisni, A. (2014). The principle of priority in Indonesian mortgage law. Journal of Legal Development, 12(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.20885/jhp.vol12.iss2.art5
Kelsen, H. (2014). General theory of law and state. Oxford University Press.
Mitia, L. (2017). The position of creditors in mortgage rights under Indonesian law. Journal of Legal Studies, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.25077/jls.8.2.101-112.2017
Mustamu, J. (2014). Legal responsibility and compensation in contractual obligations. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 44(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no3.105
Prasetyo, B. (2020). Reforming collateral law in Indonesia: Toward balanced creditor and debtor rights. Asian Journal of Law, 15(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/ajl.2020.15.1.55
Sari, D. (2019). Implementation of banking law in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Law, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.33258/jbl.v4i1.134
Susetyasi, E., & Herdiansyah, A. (2010). Bank and non-bank financial institutions: Comparative analysis. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/jfe.v2i2.789
Syahrani, R. (2012). Alternative dispute resolution in Indonesian law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2003). Mortgage rights in Indonesian banking law. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




