Competitiveness, Policy Impact, and Sensitivity of Rice Farming in Indihiang District, Tasikmalaya City

Authors

  • Tazkia Nurul Aulia Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Setiawan Sariyoga Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Siti Widiati Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Tatang Sutisna Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i6.3047

Keywords:

Competitiveness, Comparative Advantage Policy Analysis Matrix, Rice Farming, Government Policy

Abstract

Rice is the most strategic food crop and the main livelihood of most Indonesian farmers, yet domestic production faces volatile output, recurring imports, and farm-gate prices that frequently fall below the government floor price; in urban- fringe areas such as Indihiang District, rice farming is further pressured by land conversion and a dominant share-tenancy system. This study aims to analyze the competitiveness, the impact of government policy, and the sensitivity of rice farming in Indihiang District, Tasikmalaya City. Data were collected from 55 farmers selected through simple random sampling and analyzed using the Policy Analysis Matrix; social prices were estimated through the import-parity method, with the world milled-rice price converted to a paddy equivalent using the milling yield. Rice farming was competitive at market prices but was not comparatively efficient, as its social profit was negative, mainly because of the dominant share-tenancy land cost and the 2026 surge in world fertilizer prices; government policy was protective through both input subsidies and output protection from imports, while the sensitivity analysis showed that competitiveness was fragile to production losses yet resilient to input-cost increases. Rice farming in the study area is financially competitive but economically inefficient without policy support; therefore, improving productivity and managing production risk are essential to strengthen its comparative advantage and reduce dependence on protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, B. (2005). Pembangunan pertanian: Paradigma kebijakan dan strategi revitalisasi. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Afiyah, F. (2025). Analisis Daya Saing dan Dampak Kebijakan terhadap Komoditas Bawang Merah di Kecamatan Kramatwatu, Kabupaten Serang. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

Andika, A. (2023). Analisis Struktur Pasar dan Daya Saing Beras Organik Provinsi Lampung. Universitas Lampung.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Hasil Sensus Pertanian 2022. Jakarta: BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik perdagangan luar negeri Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2026). Perkembangan ekspor dan impor Indonesia Januari-Maret 2026. Jakarta: BPS.

Dudung, et al. (2025). Analisis Produksi Padi di Kota Tasikmalaya tahun 2020-2025: Tantangan dan Strategi Menuju Swasembada Pangan Nasional. Tumbuhan: Publikasi Ilmu Sosiologi Pertanian dan Ilmu Kehutanan.

Ellis, F. (1992). Agricultural policies in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumelinsi, R., et al. (2024). Analisis kebijakan pengembangan daya saing padi di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Jurnal Agribisnis, 12(1), 33-45.

Hayyin, A. (2023). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan terhadap Pertumbuhan Laba Pada Perusahan Food and Beverage yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2017-2021. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah.

Laelah, E. (2022). Daya Saing Usahatani Padi Sawah untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani di Kabupaten Serang. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

Lihare & Wenang, S. (2025). Analisis Daya Saing Komoditas Padi di Provinsi Jawa Barat Menggunakan Metode Revaled Comparative Advantage. Global Research and Innovation Journal (GREAT).

Kementerian Keuangan. (2026). APBN KiTa edisi Mei dan Juni 2026. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Pertanian. (2024). Laporan kinerja produksi padi nasional. Jakarta: Kementan.

Maulida, A., et al. (2023). Analisis daya saing usahatani padi di Kecamatan Kramatwatu Kabupaten Serang. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Tirtayasa, 5(2), 301-311.

Monke, E. A., & Pearson, S. R. (1989). The Policy Analysis Matrix for agricultural development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Murdy, S., et al. (2021). Competitiveness of rice farming and input-output price policy scenario in Jambi. Jurnal Sosio Ekonomika Bisnis, 24(1), 1-12.

Ningsih, R. (2024). Analisis daya saing usahatani padi di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 9(2), 110-122.

Otto Jastin Hasibuan. (2025). Analisis Daya Saing dan Sensitivitas Usahatani Bawang Merah di Desa Toyomerto Kecamatan Kramatwatu Kabupaten Serang. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

Saptana. (2010). Konsep keunggulan kompetitif dan komparatif komoditas pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 28(1), 1-18.

Sepfrian, W., et al. (2022). Analisis Daya Saing Usahatani Padi di Indonesia. Jurnal Agribisnis Terapan.

Soekartawi. (2002). Analisis usahatani. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tambunan, T. (2003). Daya saing produk pertanian Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development (13th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

World Bank. (2026). Commodity markets outlook. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nurul Aulia, T., Sariyoga, S., Widiati, S., & Sutisna, T. (2026). Competitiveness, Policy Impact, and Sensitivity of Rice Farming in Indihiang District, Tasikmalaya City. JURNAL ECONOMINA, 5(6), 3108–3118. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i6.3047