Is Environmental Management Accounting a Discipline? A Bibliometric Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v3i9.1362Keywords:
Environmental management, Accounting, Environmental management accounting, Development, Discipline, Bibliometric analysisAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the body of literature on environmental management accounting (EMA) and provides a quantitative overview of the academic as well as the professional literature constituting the field. By doing so, the paper discusses whether EMA has developed as a discipline. Design/methodology/approach. Based on a database containing 814 (396 of them published in academic journals) publications in English, German and French with a publication date prior to 2012 a bibliometric analysis is conducted. Data on the publications, journals, authors and citations were collected, double-checked and examined by applying bibliometric measures. Findings The bibliometric analysis identifies trends in EMA research publications which show that EMA has developed as a young discipline, but is still faces challenges to get better established in mainstream accounting and management research. Although the publication number is growing, a substantial part of the publications have been published outside mainstream accounting journals in non-accounting journals, books and reports. A recent trend towards establishing specialised environmental (and sustainability) accounting journals is also rendered apparent. The low number of highly cited publications of few authors, however, indicates that EMA is still to become a mainstream field of research. Originality/value The paper discusses with the help of bibliometric analysis and measures whether EMA has developed as a discipline and whether it has become part of mainstream accounting research.
Downloads
References
Baldvinsdottir, G., Mitchell, F. and Nørreklit, H. (2010), “Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 79-82.
Bebbington, J. and Gray, R. (2001), “An account of sustainability: failure, success and a reconceptualization”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 557-588.
Bennett, M., Rikhardsson, P. and Schaltegger, S. (2003), Environmental Management Accounting: Purpose and Progress, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Bennett, M., Schaltegger, S. and Zvezdov, D. (2011), “Environmental management accounting”, in Abdel-Kader, M. (Ed.), Review of Management Accounting Research, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 53-84.
Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D. (1981), “Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling”, Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 10, pp. 141-163.
Bradford, S.C. (1985), “Sources of information on specific subjects”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 173-180.
Branco, M.C. and Delgado, C. (2009), “Research on social and environmental accounting in Southern European countries”, Revista espan˜ ola de financiacio´n y contabilidad, Vol. 38 No. 144, pp. 663-675.
Brown, J. and Fraser, M. (2006), “Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 103-117.
Burritt, R. and Schaltegger, S. (2010), “Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 829-846
Burritt, R., Herzig, C. and Tadeo, B.D. (2009), “Environmental management accounting for cleaner production: the case of a Philippine rice mill”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 431-439.
Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S. and Zvezdov, D. (2011a), “Carbon management accounting: explaining practice in leading German companies”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 21 No. 56, pp. 80-98.
Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Pohjola, T. and Csutora, M. (Eds) (2011b), Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management, Springer, Dordrecht.
C. and Soltys, S. (2007), “Social accounting research: an Australasian perspective”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 31, pp. 73-89.
Cole, J.R. and Cole, S. (1972), “The Ortega hypothesis: citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress”, Science, Vol. 27 No. 178, pp. 368-375.
Cronin, B. (2001), “Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 558-569.
Cullen, D. and Whelan, C. (2006), “Environmental management accounting: the state of play”, Journal of Business and Economics Research, Vol. 4 No. 10, pp. 1-4.
De Bellis, N. (2009), Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD. Deegan,
de Solla Price, D. (1981), “The analysis of scientometric matrices for policy implications”, Scientometrics, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 47-53.
De Solla Price, D.J. (1974), Little Science, Big Science, Suhrkamp, Berlin. Emerald (2011), Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, Emerald, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/products/books/series.htm?id 1¼479-3598 (accessed 27 June 2011).
Evans, E., Burritt, R. and Guthrie, J. (2011), Bridgig the Gap Between Academic Accounting Research and Professional Practice, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, Sydney.
Figge, F. and Hahn, T. (2004), “Sustainable value added – measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 173-187.
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2002), “The sustainability balanced scorecard: linking sustainability management to business strategy”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 269-284.
Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B. (2010), Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, Emerald, London.
Friedlander, M.W. (1995), At the Fringes of Science, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
FT (2010), “FT business school rankings”, available at: http://rankings.ft.com/ businessschoolrankings/ (accessed 27 June 2011).
Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concept and Practice, Greenleaf, Sheffield.
Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R. (2006), “Corporate sustainability accounting: a nightmare or a dream coming true?”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 1-4.
Schaltegger, S. and Csutora, M. (2012), “Carbon management accounting: challenges and approaches”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 36, November, pp. 1-16.
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M. and Burritt, R. (2005), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. and Jasch, C. (2008), Environmental Accounting for Cleaner Production, Springer, Dordrecht.
Schaltegger, S., Mu¨ ller, K. and Hindrichsen, H. (1996), Corporate Environmental Accounting, Wiley, London.
Thomson, I. (2007), “Mapping the terrain of sustainability accounting”, in Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O’Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 19-36.
Tyteca, D. (1996), “On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms – a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 281-308.
UNDSD (2002), Environmental Management Accounting: Policies and Linkages, UNDSD, New York, NY.
UNEP (2009), Corporate Water Accounting, UNEP, Geneva.
Verfaillie, H.A., Bidwell, R. and Cowe, R. (2000), Measuring Eco-efficiency: A Guide to Reporting Company Performance, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva.
Viere, T., Schaltegger, S. and van Enden, J. (2007), “Supply chain information in environmental management accounting – the case of a Vietnamese coffee exporter”, Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 296-310.
Watkins, J.W.N. (1984), Science and Scepticism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL ECONOMINA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








