Determinants of Animal Protein Consumption in the Cities of East Kalimantan Province, 2020-2025

Authors

  • Tamara Nur Haliza Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Eny Rochaida Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Diana Lestari Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i9.4433

Keywords:

Animal protein consumption, Income structure, Population structure, PLS-SEM, Food security, East Kalimantan

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the effect of income structure and population structure on animal protein consumption in Samarinda, Balikpapan, and Bontang, East Kalimantan, during 2020–2025. Secondary panel data (18 observations) were obtained from BPS and the East Kalimantan Office of Industry, Trade, Cooperatives, and SMEs. Income structure was measured by per capita income and the city minimum wage (UMK), population structure by the population aged 0–14, 15–59, and 60+ years, and animal protein consumption by beef and chicken meat consumption. Data were analysed using PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 4) with 5,000 bootstrap subsamples. The results show that income structure (β = 0.808; t = 6.440; p < 0.001) and population structure (β = 0.570; t = 4.252; p < 0.001) have positive and significant effects on animal protein consumption, with an R² of 0.828 and a Q²predict of 0.781. Food security policies should maintain purchasing power and anticipate population-driven demand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANTARA. (2023). Bahan pangan asal ternak Kaltim aman hingga Idul Fitri. ANTARA News Kalimantan Timur. https://kaltim.antaranews.com/berita/180312/bahan-pangan-asal-ternak-kaltim-aman-hingga-idul-fitri

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Rata-rata konsumsi per kapita seminggu beberapa macam bahan makanan penting, 2007–2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Balikpapan. (2021–2026). Kota Balikpapan dalam angka 2021–2026. BPS Kota Balikpapan.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bontang. (2021–2026). Kota Bontang dalam angka 2021–2026. BPS Kota Bontang.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Samarinda. (2021–2026). Kota Samarinda dalam angka 2021–2026. BPS Kota Samarinda.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dinas Perindustrian, Perdagangan, Koperasi, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. (2020–2025). Data konsumsi daging sapi dan daging ayam Kota Samarinda, Kota Balikpapan, dan Kota Bontang.

FAO. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security and World Food Summit plan of action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hidayat, D. N., Pujiati, A., & Nihayah, D. M. (2024). Analisis elastisitas faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi permintaan daging sapi 4(2). Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Ikhlas, M., Hasid, Z., & Noor, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi permintaan ayam pedaging ras di Kota Samarinda, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.29264/jiem.v6i3.7900

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.

Lestari, W. P. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi konsumsi rumah tangga PNS guru SD di Kecamatan Kotaanyar Kabupaten Probolinggo. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 4(2), 1–11. https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/2827

Nazarius, N., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Analisis penawaran dan permintaan daging sapi di Kalimantan Timur. Journal of Livestock and Animal Health, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.32530/jlah.v7i1.29

Ningsih, M., Suandi, & Damayanti, Y. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pola konsumsi pangan dan gizi rumah tangga nelayan Kecamatan Tungkal Ilir Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat. Sosio Ekonomika Bisnis, 15(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiseb.v15i1.2742

OECD/FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2021–2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 63 Tahun 2022 tentang Perincian Rencana Induk Ibu Kota Nusantara. (2022).

Reksoprayitno, S. (2000). Ekonomi makro: Pengantar analisis pendapatan nasional. Liberty.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

Rochaida, E., & Haliza, T. N. (2022). Analisis permintaan daging sapi di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. Universitas Mulawarman.

Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press.

Umaroh, R., & Vinantia, A. (2018). Analisis konsumsi protein hewani pada rumah tangga Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 18(3), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.2018.13

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Tamara Nur Haliza, Eny Rochaida, & Diana Lestari. (2026). Determinants of Animal Protein Consumption in the Cities of East Kalimantan Province, 2020-2025. JURNAL ECONOMINA, 5(9), 7530–7543. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i9.4433