The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Bank Performance with Organizational Culture as a Moderating Variable: A Study at Bank BJB’s Bogor Branch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i9.4343Keywords:
Good Corporate Governance, organizational culture, bank performance, moderation, Regional Development BanksAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on the performance of Bank BJB’s Bogor Branch and to examine the role of organizational culture as a moderating variable. The study employed a quantitative approach with a saturated sample of 60 employees at Bank BJB’s Bogor Branch. Data were collected using a questionnaire with a Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results indicate that the implementation of GCG falls into the high category, with an average score of 3.692 and a Respondent Achievement Level (RAL) of 73.83%. Organizational culture also falls into the high category with an average of 3.702 and a RAC of 74.04%, while branch performance achieved an average of 3.725 and a RAC of 74.50%. The test results indicate that GCG has a positive and significant effect on performance, with a regression coefficient of 0.985, a t-value of 9.928, and a significance level of <0.001. The coefficient of determination of 0.630 indicates that GCG explains 63.0% of the variation in performance. Organizational culture has a direct, positive, and significant effect on performance. However, the interaction between GCG and organizational culture does not have a significant effect on performance, with an interaction coefficient of −0.045, a t-value of −0.343, and a significance level of 0.733. Thus, organizational culture is not shown to moderate the relationship between GCG and performance. The findings indicate that GCG and organizational culture are best understood as two factors that contribute directly to organizational performance
Downloads
References
Barth, A., & Mansouri, S. (2021). Organizational culture and bank performance.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2015). Corporate Governance Principles for Banks. Bank for International Settlements.
Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.
Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
Ende, E., & Kusuma, J. W. (2017). Peran Citra Merek, Persepsi Harga, Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Minat Beli Produk Smartphone Merek Xiaomi. Sains: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 9(2).
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Guilford Press.
Hopt, K. J. (2021). Corporate governance of banks and other financial institutions.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023. OECD Publishing.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola bagi Bank Umum.
Puspitha, & Sujana. (2016). Kajian mengenai budaya organisasi, GCG dan kinerja.
Rashid, et al. (2020). Corporate governance and bank performance.
Soraya, & Suardana. (2018). Kajian budaya organisasi sebagai pemoderasi hubungan tata kelola dan kinerja
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ECONOMINA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








