he Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Values Companies in the Coal Subsector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020-2024 Period

Adelia Emmanuella Hutahaean; Jadongan Sijabat; Manatap Berliana Lumban Gaol

doi:10.55681/economina.v5i7.3109

Authors

Adelia Emmanuella Hutahaean Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan, Indonesia
Jadongan Sijabat Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan, Indonesia
Manatap Berliana Lumban Gaol Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i7.3109

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, Stakeholder Theory

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on firm value in coal mining sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2020-2024. The study is based on stakeholder theory, which emphasize that companies are responsible not only to stakeholders but also to all stakeholders. The research employs a quantitative method using secondary data obtained from financial statements, annual reports, and sustainability reports. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling, resulting in 13 companies with a total of 65 observations. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS version 26. The results indicate that Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive and significant effect on firm value with a significance value of 0.024. the Adjusted R Square value of 0.063 indicates that Corporate Social Responsibility explains 6,3 % of the variation is explained by other factors outside the research model. Therefore, the higher the level of Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure, the higher the firm value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, A., Sumual, C. J. E., Muliati, & Lestari, R. O. (2021). Profitabilitas dan corporate social responsibility (CSR) terhadap nilai perusahaan. AKUNTABEL: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 18(1), 82–90.

Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2020). Dasar-dasar manajemen keuangan (Edisi ke-14). Salemba Empat.

Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716

Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting associated with firm performance? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149

Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2026). Laporan keuangan, annual report, dan sustainability report perusahaan subsektor batu bara periode 2020–2024.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (Edisi ke-9). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266

Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581

Postiglione, M., Carini, C., & Falini, A. (2024). ESG and firm value: A hybrid literature review on cost of capital implications from Scopus database. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6457–6480. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2940

Prno, J. (2013). An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resources Policy, 38(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. (2007). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106.

Velte, P. (2022). Meta-analyses on corporate social responsibility (CSR): A literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 72(2), 627–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00211-2