Determinants of Gen Z Work Productivity in Retail and E-Commerce: The Role of Perceived Ease of Technology, FoMO, and Emotional Spending

Authors

  • Desi Ratnasari Universitas Pertiba, Indonesia
  • Suhardi Universitas Pertiba, Indonesia
  • Mat Amin Universitas Pertiba, Indonesia
  • Rahmad Firdaus Universitas Pertiba, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i5.2024

Keywords:

Gen Z, work productivity, perceived ease of technology, FoMO, emotional spending

Abstract

This study aims to examine the determinants of work productivity among Generation Z employees in the retail and e-commerce sector by analyzing the roles of perceived ease of technology, Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), and emotional spending. A quantitative approach was employed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from 200 Generation Z employees working in retail and e-commerce industries in Indonesia through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. The measurement model was evaluated using validity and reliability tests, while the structural model was assessed through path coefficients, R-square, and predictive relevance. The results reveal that perceived ease of technology has a positive and significant effect on work productivity, indicating that user-friendly systems enhance efficiency and performance. In contrast, FoMO and materialism do not show significant effects on productivity, suggesting that psychological factors may not directly influence work outcomes in this context. Furthermore, emotional spending does not significantly affect productivity and does not mediate the relationship between the independent variables and work productivity. These findings highlight that technological factors are more dominant than psychological and behavioral factors in shaping productivity among Generation Z employees in digital work environments, particularly in retail and e-commerce sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2020). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

Alt, D. (2018). Students’ wellbeing, fear of missing out, and social media engagement for leisure in higher education learning environments. Current Psychology, 37(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9496-1

Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2011). Retail therapy: A strategic effort to improve mood. Psychology & Marketing, 28(6), 638–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20404

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Deloitte. (2023). Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey 2023. Deloitte Insights.

Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152.

Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Chen, S., & Pallesen, S. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of fear of missing out (FoMO). Journal of Business Research, 124, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.049

Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., van Rooij, A., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use. Addictive Behaviors, 75, 1–7.

Google, Temasek, & Bain & Company. (2023). e-Conomy SEA 2023 Report.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

International Labour Organization. (2022). Global employment trends for youth 2022.

Kemp, E., Kennett-Hensel, P., & Kees, J. (2014). Pulling on the heartstrings: Examining the effects of emotions and gender in persuasive appeals. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 69–79.

Loewenstein, G. (2001). The role of affect in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 272–292.

Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever. Applied Psychology, 69(1), 1–45.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing mediation. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.

Rick, S. I., Pereira, B., & Burson, K. A. (2018). The benefits of retail therapy: Making purchase decisions reduces residual sadness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 373–380.

Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., & Javor, A. (2020). Technostress from a neurobiological perspective. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(2), 181–191.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18.

Singh, A. P., & Dangmei, J. (2021). Understanding the generation Z: The future workforce. South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 1–5.

Sonnentag, S. (2022). The psychology of working life. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology, 9, 1–27.

Statista. (2024). Global e-commerce statistics and trends.

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42.

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2017). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 11–23.

UNCTAD. (2023). Digital economy report 2023.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2022). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly.

Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2020). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 759–778.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Ratnasari, D., Suhardi, Amin, M., & Firdaus, R. (2026). Determinants of Gen Z Work Productivity in Retail and E-Commerce: The Role of Perceived Ease of Technology, FoMO, and Emotional Spending. JURNAL ECONOMINA, 5(5), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i5.2024