Scoping Review of Technostress Drivers and Mitigation Strategies in Hybrid Work Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v5i6.2683Keywords:
Technostress, Hybrid Work, Digital Well-being, E-Leadership, Techno-invasion, E-HRMAbstract
Objective: This study aims to systematically analyze the antecedents, impacts, and mitigation strategies of technostress specifically within the context of hybrid work environments. It seeks to address the emerging "digitalization paradox," in which the flexibility of remote work arrangements paradoxically compromises employee psychological well- being and long-term sustainability. Research Design & Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map the evolving landscape of digital stress. The dataset was retrieved from the Scopus database, focusing on peer-reviewed empirical articles published between 2020 and 2025. A final corpus of 50 high- quality studies was analyzed using a dual approach of bibliometric mapping to identify temporal trends and thematic synthesis to consolidate k ey narratives. Findings: The analysis reveals a critical shift in stressors from technical accessibility to "techno-invasion" and the "always-on" culture. Specific phenomena, such as videoconferencing fatigue and cognitive fragmentation, emerged as distinct drivers of exhaustion. The findings highlight a "sustainability gap" in which organizational productivity in hybrid models is often maintained by depleting employees' cognitive resources, leading to accelerated burnout despite reported flexibility. Implications & Recommendations: The study implies that individual coping mechanisms are insufficient to combat systemic technostress. Practical recommendations for management include moving beyond soft wellness programs to implement structural "guardrails," such as formal "Right to Disconnect" policies. Furthermore, leadership training must pivot towards "digital empathy" and asynchronous communication protocols to effectively buffer the physiological strain of virtual work. Contribution & Value Added: This research extends the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model by conceptualizing digital tools as "conditional resources" that become demands when boundary management is absent. It contributes a novel conceptual framework that links specific digital antecedents to divergent organizational outcomes, offering a blueprint for designing healthier socio-technical.
Downloads
References
Abramova, O., & Gladkaya, M. (2025). Behind Videoconferencing Fatigue at Work: The Taxing Effects of Self-View and the Mediating Role of Public Self-Awareness. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 67(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-024-00874-7
Agalliu, P., & Ibrahimi, S. (2025). The right to disconnect and techno-stress in home-working: A comparative legal and psychological analysis in the European union and the Western Balkans. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(6), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i6.7756
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a Day’s Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Baurai, S., Sekhar, C., Kumar, D., & Raj, A. (2025). Digitalization and employee well-being: A fuzzy-tism approach of remote work stressors. Journal of Management and Organization, 31(6), 3004–3028. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10059
Bondanini, G., Giovanelli, C., Mucci, N., & Giorgi, G. (2025). The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845
Bondanini, G., Sanchez-Gomez, M., Mucci, N., & Giorgi, G. (2025). Digital Connectivity at Work: Balancing Benefits and Risks for Engagement, Technostress, and Performance. Administrative Sciences, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15100398
Buzás, B., Simon, A. C., Kiss, O. E., & Faragó, K. (2025). Navigating the digital landscape: unraveling the interplay of challenge and hindrance components of technostress on employee voice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1434275
Domagalska-Grędys, M., & Sroka, W. (2025). A Balanced Professional and Private Life? Organisational and Personal Determinants of Work–Life Balance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167390
Girardi, D., Rapisarda, S., Arcucci, E., Dal Corso, L., Riedl, R., Pividori, I., & Falco, A. (2025). Supervisor support and virtual leadership moderate the association between technostress creators and strain in remote work: Evidence based on hair cortisol and occupational physician’s hetero-evaluations. PLOS ONE, 20(6 JUNE). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323385
Jain, S., Varma, V., Tata, T. S., & Cabral, C. (2025). Technostress influence on innovative work behaviour and the mitigating effect of leader-member exchange: A moderated mediation study in the Indian banking industry. Acta Psychologica, 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104875
Jakstiene, R., Lazauskaite-Zabielske, J., Ziedelis, A., & Urbanaviciute, I. (2025). Segmentation Supplies and Work–Life Conflict in Sustainable Future Work: Longitudinal Evidence from Teleworkers and Office Workers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411302
Jakstiene, R., Urbanaviciute, I., Ziedelis, A., & Lazauskaite-Zabielske, J. (2025). Struggling or Thriving With Technology at Work: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Personal and Organizational ICT Resources. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5422987
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science : IS, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Mdhluli, N. I. (2025). Perils of perpetual connectivity: Navigating the ‘always-on’ culture in the modern workplace. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 23. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v23i0.3019
Muhamad, N. A., Ma’amor, N. H., Jamalluddin, N. H., Rosli, I. A., Leman, F. N., Shah, T. P. N. T. B., Misnan, N. S., Abdullah, N., Johari, M. Z., Chemi, N., Ibrahim, N., Isa, M. F. M., Sabri, M. A. R., Azmi, A. F., Hussian, R. L. A. R., Heng, C. J., Hao, L. Y., Zakaria, Z. I., Najid, S. N., … Wei, O. H. (2025). Technostress and its associated factors: Burnout and fatigue among Malaysian healthcare workers (HCWs) in state hospitals. PLOS ONE, 20(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319506
Phuong, P. N.-D., Nguyen, H. H., Giang, T. T., Duong, H. C., & Nguyen, L. D.-Y. (2024). Linking New Ways of Working to Employee Performance in Emerging Countries: The Interplay of Technostress, and Meaningful Work. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241289988
Popovac, R., Vukmirović, D., Comic, T., & Pavlovic, Z. G. (2025). Evaluating the Impact of Remote Work on Employee Health and Sustainable Lifestyles in the IT Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198677
Úbeda García, M., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C., & Poveda-Pareja, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence, knowledge and human resource management: A systematic literature review of theoretical tensions and strategic implications. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100809
Xie, W., & Yang, R. (2025). Exploring the influence of individual digitalization on technostress in Chinese IT remote workers: The mediating role of Information Processing demands and the Job Complexity. Acta Psychologica, 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104882
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ECONOMINA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








